The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2022
Differential Sodium Current Remodelling Identifies Distinct Cellular Proarrhythmic Mechanisms in Paroxysmal vs Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Casini Simona, Marchal Gerard A, Kawasaki Makiri, Fabrizi Benedetta, Wesselink Robin, Nariswari Fransisca A, Neefs Jolien, van den Berg Nicoline W E, Driessen Antoine H G, de Groot Joris R, Verkerk Arie O, Remme Carol Ann
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The cellular mechanisms underlying progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are not fully understood, but alterations in (late) sodium current (INa) have been proposed. Human studies investigating electrophysiological changes at the paroxysmal stage of AF are sparse, with the majority employing right atrial appendage cardiomyocytes (CMs). We here investigated action potential (AP) characteristics and (late) INa remodelling in left atrial appendage CMs (LAA-CMs) from patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF and patients in sinus rhythm (SR), as well as the potential contribution of the "neuronal" sodium channel SCN10A/NaV1.8.
METHODS: Peak INa, late INa and AP properties were investigated through patch-clamp analysis on single LAA-CMs, whereas quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to assess SCN5A/SCN10A expression levels in LAA tissue.
RESULTS: In paroxysmal and persistent AF LAA-CMs, AP duration was shorter than in SR LAA-CMs. Compared with SR, peak INa and SCN5A expression were significantly decreased in paroxysmal AF, whereas they were restored to SR levels in persistent AF. Conversely, although late INa was unchanged in paroxysmal AF compared with SR, it was significantly increased in persistent AF. Peak or late Nav1.8-based INa was not detected in persistent AF LAA-CMs. Similarly, expression of SCN10A was not observed in LAAs at any stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate differences in (late) INa remodeling in LAA-CMs from patients with paroxysmal vs persistent AF, indicating distinct cellular proarrhythmic mechanisms in different AF forms. These observations are of particular relevance when considering potential pharmacologic approaches targeting (late) INa in AF.
METHODS: Peak INa, late INa and AP properties were investigated through patch-clamp analysis on single LAA-CMs, whereas quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to assess SCN5A/SCN10A expression levels in LAA tissue.
RESULTS: In paroxysmal and persistent AF LAA-CMs, AP duration was shorter than in SR LAA-CMs. Compared with SR, peak INa and SCN5A expression were significantly decreased in paroxysmal AF, whereas they were restored to SR levels in persistent AF. Conversely, although late INa was unchanged in paroxysmal AF compared with SR, it was significantly increased in persistent AF. Peak or late Nav1.8-based INa was not detected in persistent AF LAA-CMs. Similarly, expression of SCN10A was not observed in LAAs at any stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate differences in (late) INa remodeling in LAA-CMs from patients with paroxysmal vs persistent AF, indicating distinct cellular proarrhythmic mechanisms in different AF forms. These observations are of particular relevance when considering potential pharmacologic approaches targeting (late) INa in AF.