Allergy · 2000
Intolerance of osteosynthesis material: evidence of dichromate contact allergy with concomitant oligoclonal T-cell infiltrate and TH1-type cytokine expression in the peri-implantar tissue.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Thomas P, Summer B, Sander C A, Przybilla B, Thomas M, Naumann T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We report on a 37-year-old man without history of previous allergic disease who developed an aseptic intolerance reaction to a chromium-cobalt alloy, with local discomfort, loosening, and absence of fracture healing. Both in vivo and in vitro allergoimmunologic diagnostic tests were performed.
METHODS: Patch testing was done with a European standard series. Specific serum IgE was measured by CAP-FEIA. In addition to immunohistology (APAAP method), peri-implantar tissue was further analyzed by PCR to determine T-cell-receptor-gamma rearrangement and thus the potential clonal (antigen-driven) T-cell repertoire. The actual tissue mRNA expression for IL-4, IL-6, and IFN-gamma was visualized by RT-PCR.
RESULTS: Skin testing gave a delayed-type reaction to dichromate. Specific serum IgE to natural rubber latex and grass pollen was found--but without clinical symptoms. Immunohistology revealed a monocytic and dense T-cell infiltrate. The latter, instead of being random, showed an oligoclonal T-cell receptor rearrangement. In addition, there was TH1-type mediator expression (IL-6 and IFN-gamma, but not IL-4).
CONCLUSIONS: Skin test, examination of peri-implantar tissue, and the prompt healing after replacement of the osteosynthesis material suggest an allergic reaction. PCR analysis of peri-implantar tissue can further help to identify and understand allergy-mediated implant intolerance reactions.
METHODS: Patch testing was done with a European standard series. Specific serum IgE was measured by CAP-FEIA. In addition to immunohistology (APAAP method), peri-implantar tissue was further analyzed by PCR to determine T-cell-receptor-gamma rearrangement and thus the potential clonal (antigen-driven) T-cell repertoire. The actual tissue mRNA expression for IL-4, IL-6, and IFN-gamma was visualized by RT-PCR.
RESULTS: Skin testing gave a delayed-type reaction to dichromate. Specific serum IgE to natural rubber latex and grass pollen was found--but without clinical symptoms. Immunohistology revealed a monocytic and dense T-cell infiltrate. The latter, instead of being random, showed an oligoclonal T-cell receptor rearrangement. In addition, there was TH1-type mediator expression (IL-6 and IFN-gamma, but not IL-4).
CONCLUSIONS: Skin test, examination of peri-implantar tissue, and the prompt healing after replacement of the osteosynthesis material suggest an allergic reaction. PCR analysis of peri-implantar tissue can further help to identify and understand allergy-mediated implant intolerance reactions.