Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2022
Spatial relationship of localized sources of persistent atrial fibrillation identified by a unipolar-based automated algorithm to complex fractionated atrial electrocardiograms and atrial low voltage areas.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nagase Takahiko, Kato Ryuichi, Asano So, Fukunaga Hiroshi, Yoshida Yoshinori, Hayashi Yosuke, Sekiguchi Yukio, Nanasato Mamoru, Nitta Junichi, Isobe Mitsuaki
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Spatial characteristics of localized sources of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) identified by unipolar-based panoramic mapping software (CARTOFINDER) remain unclear. We evaluated spatial characteristics of bi-atrial AF localized sources in relation to complex fractionated atrial electrocardiograms (CFAEs) and atrial low voltage area (LVAs) (≤0.35 mV during AF).
METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients with persistent AF underwent bi-atrial voltage, CFAE, and CARTOFINDER mapping before the beginning of ablation (18 [90%] patients, initial procedure; 2 [10%] patients, repeat procedure). CFAEs were recorded using the interval confidence level (ICL) mode and defined as sites with a confidence level of ≥80% of maximal ICL number. We elucidated the following: (1) differences in the rate of AF localized sources and CFAEs inside or outside the atrial LVAs; (2) distribution of AF localized sources and CFAEs; and (3) distance between the closest points of AF localized sources and CFAEs. A total of 270 AF localized sources and 486 CFAEs were identified in 20 patients. AF localized sources were confirmed more often outside atrial LVAs than CFAEs (71% vs. 46% outside LVA, p < .001). AF localized sources and CFAEs were diffusely distributed without any tendency in bi-atria. Mean distance between closest AF localized sources and CFAEs was 22 ± 8 mm.
CONCLUSION: AF localized sources identified by CARTOFINDER are different therapeutic targets as compared to CFAEs and could be confirmed both inside and outside atrial LVAs.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients with persistent AF underwent bi-atrial voltage, CFAE, and CARTOFINDER mapping before the beginning of ablation (18 [90%] patients, initial procedure; 2 [10%] patients, repeat procedure). CFAEs were recorded using the interval confidence level (ICL) mode and defined as sites with a confidence level of ≥80% of maximal ICL number. We elucidated the following: (1) differences in the rate of AF localized sources and CFAEs inside or outside the atrial LVAs; (2) distribution of AF localized sources and CFAEs; and (3) distance between the closest points of AF localized sources and CFAEs. A total of 270 AF localized sources and 486 CFAEs were identified in 20 patients. AF localized sources were confirmed more often outside atrial LVAs than CFAEs (71% vs. 46% outside LVA, p < .001). AF localized sources and CFAEs were diffusely distributed without any tendency in bi-atria. Mean distance between closest AF localized sources and CFAEs was 22 ± 8 mm.
CONCLUSION: AF localized sources identified by CARTOFINDER are different therapeutic targets as compared to CFAEs and could be confirmed both inside and outside atrial LVAs.