Heart rhythm · 2022
Gaps after linear ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (Marshall-PLAN): Clinical implication.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Takagi Takamitsu, Derval Nicolas, Duchateau Josselin, Chauvel Rémi, Tixier Romain, Marchand Hugo, Bouyer Benjamin, André Clémentine, Kamakura Tsukasa, Krisai Philipp, Ascione Ciro, Balbo Conrado, Cheniti Ghassen, Denis Arnaud, Sacher Frédéric, Hocini Mélèze, Jaïs Pierre, Haïssaguerre Michel, Pambrun Thomas
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Beyond pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, anatomic isthmus transection is an adjunctive strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation. Data on the durability of multiple lines of block remain scarce.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of gaps within such a lesion set.
METHODS: We followed 291 consecutive patients who underwent (1) vein of Marshall ethanol infusion, (2) PV isolation, and (3) mitral, cavotricuspid, and dome isthmus transection. Dome transection relied on 2 distinct strategies over time: a single roof line with touch-ups applied in case of gap demonstrated by conventional maneuvers (first leg), and an alternative floor line if the roof line exhibited a gap during high-density mapping with careful electrogram reannotation (second leg).
RESULTS: Twelve-month sinus rhythm maintenance was 70% after 1 procedure and 94% after 1 or 2 procedures. Event-free survival after the first procedure was lower in case of residual gaps within the lesion set (log-rank, P = .004). Delayed gaps were found in 94% of a second procedure performed in the 69 patients relapsing despite a complete lesion set with PV gaps increasing the risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation (67% vs 34%; P = .02) and anatomic isthmus gaps supporting a majority of atrial tachycardias (60%). Between the first leg and the second leg, a significant decrease was found in roof lines considered blocked during the first procedure (99% vs 78%; P < .001) and in delayed dome gaps observed during a second procedure (68% vs 43%; P = .05).
CONCLUSION: Gaps are arrhythmogenic and can be reduced by optimized ablation and assessment of lines of block. Closing these gaps improves sinus rhythm maintenance.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of gaps within such a lesion set.
METHODS: We followed 291 consecutive patients who underwent (1) vein of Marshall ethanol infusion, (2) PV isolation, and (3) mitral, cavotricuspid, and dome isthmus transection. Dome transection relied on 2 distinct strategies over time: a single roof line with touch-ups applied in case of gap demonstrated by conventional maneuvers (first leg), and an alternative floor line if the roof line exhibited a gap during high-density mapping with careful electrogram reannotation (second leg).
RESULTS: Twelve-month sinus rhythm maintenance was 70% after 1 procedure and 94% after 1 or 2 procedures. Event-free survival after the first procedure was lower in case of residual gaps within the lesion set (log-rank, P = .004). Delayed gaps were found in 94% of a second procedure performed in the 69 patients relapsing despite a complete lesion set with PV gaps increasing the risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation (67% vs 34%; P = .02) and anatomic isthmus gaps supporting a majority of atrial tachycardias (60%). Between the first leg and the second leg, a significant decrease was found in roof lines considered blocked during the first procedure (99% vs 78%; P < .001) and in delayed dome gaps observed during a second procedure (68% vs 43%; P = .05).
CONCLUSION: Gaps are arrhythmogenic and can be reduced by optimized ablation and assessment of lines of block. Closing these gaps improves sinus rhythm maintenance.