MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0221088

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2019

Utility of imaging modalities for predicting carcinogenesis in lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia.

Omori Makiko, Kondo Tetsuo, Tagaya Hikaru, Watanabe Yumika, Fukasawa Hiroko, Kawai Masataka, Nakazawa Kumiko, Hashi Akihiko, Hirata Shuji

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the use of imaging methods for predicting carcinogenesis in lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed preoperative images on transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 23 cases with histologically diagnosed LEGH.

RESULTS

Shape of cervical multicystic lesions on MR images could be divided into two types the flower-type with many small cysts surrounded by larger cysts, and the raspberry-type with many tiny, closely aggregated cysts. Six (46%) of 13 cases had raspberry-type lesions that were not detected on transvaginal sonography but were seen on MRI. Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) was identified in 4 postmenopausal women with raspberry-type lesions during the follow-up periods. In these cases, cytologic examination by targeted endocervical sampling using sonography enabled early detection of AIS.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI and cytologic examination by targeted endocervical sampling may be very useful for predicting carcinogenesis in LEGH.

Для цитирования: Omori Makiko, Kondo Tetsuo, Tagaya Hikaru, Watanabe Yumika, Fukasawa Hiroko, Kawai Masataka, Nakazawa Kumiko, Hashi Akihiko, Hirata Shuji. Utility of imaging modalities for predicting carcinogenesis in lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia.. PloS one. 2019. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221088.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.