BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024
Comparing 24-hour IOP fluctuation slope curve between newly diagnosed ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Qing, Feng Hui, Zhang Ye, Han Dong, Tang Guangxian, Fan Su Jie, Zhang Hengli, Jiang Jing, Lv Aiguo, Li Shuning
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation slope curve between newly diagnosed patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Newly diagnosed and untreated OHT and POAG patients who underwent 24-hour IOP monitoring were consecutively enrolled in the study. IOP measurements were taken every 2 hours from 8:00 to 6:00 hours the following day using an iCare PRO tonometer. Patients maintained their daily routines, with IOP measured in a seated position during the day and supine at night. The 24-hour IOP fluctuation indices, including peak, trough and overall fluctuation, were calculated. Differences in the 24-hour IOP fluctuation slope curves over time between groups were analysed using a generalised additive mixed model.
RESULTS: 46 patients with OHT and 41 with POAG were included. From 2:00 to 10:00 hours, mean IOP increased by 0.69 mm Hg every 2 hours in the POAG group (p<0.0001) and by 0.40 mm Hg in the OHT group (p<0.0001). After 10:00, the IOP showed a downward trend, decreasing by 0.31 mm Hg in the POAG group (p<0.0001) and by 0.17 mm Hg in the OHT group (p=0.0003) every 2 hours. The rate of slope change in the upward phase differed significantly between the groups (0.30 mm Hg per 2 hours; p=0.02), as did the rate in the downward phase (0.14 mm Hg per 2 hours; p for interaction=0.04). Multivariate models showed that each 1 mm Hg increase in circadian and diurnal IOP fluctuation was associated with a 27% and 21% higher likelihood of POAG presence, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The 24-hour IOP slope curve differed between POAG and OHT, with a steeper slope observed in the POAG group. However, the study is limited by potential confounding factors, reliance on a single 24-hour measurement period and the need for further longitudinal studies to validate these findings.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Newly diagnosed and untreated OHT and POAG patients who underwent 24-hour IOP monitoring were consecutively enrolled in the study. IOP measurements were taken every 2 hours from 8:00 to 6:00 hours the following day using an iCare PRO tonometer. Patients maintained their daily routines, with IOP measured in a seated position during the day and supine at night. The 24-hour IOP fluctuation indices, including peak, trough and overall fluctuation, were calculated. Differences in the 24-hour IOP fluctuation slope curves over time between groups were analysed using a generalised additive mixed model.
RESULTS: 46 patients with OHT and 41 with POAG were included. From 2:00 to 10:00 hours, mean IOP increased by 0.69 mm Hg every 2 hours in the POAG group (p<0.0001) and by 0.40 mm Hg in the OHT group (p<0.0001). After 10:00, the IOP showed a downward trend, decreasing by 0.31 mm Hg in the POAG group (p<0.0001) and by 0.17 mm Hg in the OHT group (p=0.0003) every 2 hours. The rate of slope change in the upward phase differed significantly between the groups (0.30 mm Hg per 2 hours; p=0.02), as did the rate in the downward phase (0.14 mm Hg per 2 hours; p for interaction=0.04). Multivariate models showed that each 1 mm Hg increase in circadian and diurnal IOP fluctuation was associated with a 27% and 21% higher likelihood of POAG presence, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The 24-hour IOP slope curve differed between POAG and OHT, with a steeper slope observed in the POAG group. However, the study is limited by potential confounding factors, reliance on a single 24-hour measurement period and the need for further longitudinal studies to validate these findings.