European journal of ophthalmology · 2024
Multiple medications and quality of life of Nigerians with primary open angle glaucoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nnubia Chinasa Anderline, Nwosu Sebastian Ndulue Ntuko, Okpala Nonso Ejikeme, Apakama Akunne Ijeoma, Orji Ifeanyi James, Uba-Obiano Chizoba Udoka, Onyiaorah Adaora Amaoge
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the impact of multiple medications on the quality of life of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients on medical treatment at Guinness Eye Centre Onitsha, Nigeria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with POAG who were undergoing medical therapy were selected through systematic sampling. They were asked to provide information on socio-demographic background, the number and types of glaucoma medications they were using and any adverse effects encountered while using these medications. The patients' quality of life was assessed by utilizing the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) and all patients completed ocular examination. Data analysis was with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-one patients, aged 40-83 years, mean 59.1 ± 11.1 were studied; there were 79(46.2%) males and 92(53.8%) females. One hundred and nine (63.7%) patients were on multiple medications. Side effects of treatment increased with increasing number of medications. The mean quality of life score in monotherapy group and double therapy group were 89.3 ± 15.8 and 80.2 ± 21.1 respectively; while that in ≥ triple therapy group was 78.9 ± 18.8. This decrease in mean quality of life score with increasing number of medications was statistically significant in bivariate analysis (P < 0.01), however, multiple regression analysis showed that the number of medications did not significantly affect the quality of life scores after adjusting for confounding variables(p = 0.881).
CONCLUSION: Among the patients studied, use of multiple medications, unlike visual acuity (VA) and severity of glaucoma, was not an independent predictor of quality of life.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with POAG who were undergoing medical therapy were selected through systematic sampling. They were asked to provide information on socio-demographic background, the number and types of glaucoma medications they were using and any adverse effects encountered while using these medications. The patients' quality of life was assessed by utilizing the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) and all patients completed ocular examination. Data analysis was with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-one patients, aged 40-83 years, mean 59.1 ± 11.1 were studied; there were 79(46.2%) males and 92(53.8%) females. One hundred and nine (63.7%) patients were on multiple medications. Side effects of treatment increased with increasing number of medications. The mean quality of life score in monotherapy group and double therapy group were 89.3 ± 15.8 and 80.2 ± 21.1 respectively; while that in ≥ triple therapy group was 78.9 ± 18.8. This decrease in mean quality of life score with increasing number of medications was statistically significant in bivariate analysis (P < 0.01), however, multiple regression analysis showed that the number of medications did not significantly affect the quality of life scores after adjusting for confounding variables(p = 0.881).
CONCLUSION: Among the patients studied, use of multiple medications, unlike visual acuity (VA) and severity of glaucoma, was not an independent predictor of quality of life.