International ophthalmology · 2024
The accuracy of self-reported family history in glaucoma in Brazil.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Almeida Figueiredo Ana Galrão, Nogueira Isadora Ferro, de Moura Santos Pereira Ferraz Baptista Liane, Foganholo Jady, Iguma Camila Ishii, Abe Ricardo Yuji
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of a positive self-reported glaucoma family history.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Each subject was asked if they had a first-degree relative diagnosed with glaucoma. If their answer was affirmative, the relative was invited to attend on ophthalmic evaluation and underwent complementary exams to confirm or exclude the glaucoma diagnosis. Only one relative was included per subject.
RESULTS: We included 204 subjects in the study (102 subjects and their respective relatives). The accuracy of family history of glaucoma was 76.96% of the cases. In the univariable analysis, subjects with college degree had 2.34 [(P = 0.010; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-4.63)], with higher family income 3.72 (P = 0.003; 95% CI 1.57-8.85) and those with health insurance 3.42 (P = 0.001; 95% CI 1.67-6.98) more chances to have a true positive family history for glaucoma. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, none of the variables presented significant association.
CONCLUSION: Around 24% of patients may not provide reliable information about family history for glaucoma. When asking about a glaucoma family history, clinicians should consider the real accuracy of this self-reported data.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Each subject was asked if they had a first-degree relative diagnosed with glaucoma. If their answer was affirmative, the relative was invited to attend on ophthalmic evaluation and underwent complementary exams to confirm or exclude the glaucoma diagnosis. Only one relative was included per subject.
RESULTS: We included 204 subjects in the study (102 subjects and their respective relatives). The accuracy of family history of glaucoma was 76.96% of the cases. In the univariable analysis, subjects with college degree had 2.34 [(P = 0.010; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-4.63)], with higher family income 3.72 (P = 0.003; 95% CI 1.57-8.85) and those with health insurance 3.42 (P = 0.001; 95% CI 1.67-6.98) more chances to have a true positive family history for glaucoma. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, none of the variables presented significant association.
CONCLUSION: Around 24% of patients may not provide reliable information about family history for glaucoma. When asking about a glaucoma family history, clinicians should consider the real accuracy of this self-reported data.