Cirugia y cirujanos · 2021
Prostate cancer early detection among primary care physicians in Mexico: A cross-sectional study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Basulto-Martínez Mario, Ojeda-Pérez Jorge E, Velueta-Martínez Iván A, Cueto-Vega Guillermo J, Flores-Tapia Juan P, González-Losa Ma Del Refugio
Аннотация
AIM: This study aims to assess primary care physicians (PCPs) knowledge and skills regarding prostate cancer early detection (PCa-ED).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey about knowledge and skills of PCa-ED was delivered to PCP. Logistic regression analysis was conducted for the propensity of PCP to test prostatic specific antigen (PSA) on asymptomatic men.
RESULTS: The survey was completed by 170 PCP. Score on risk factors knowledge was 51.5 ± 15.7% a better score was not associated with conducting PCa-ED (p = 0.674). The 40.6% answered having an institutional program on PCa-ED and 86% having access to PSA testing. Testing PSA on asymptomatic men was found in 40%. Moreover, 61.2% do not performed any digital rectal examination for PCa-ED, and this was not associated with preventing factors such as lack of space, time, and assistance (p > 0.05). Fewer years in practice and being a family medicine resident were associated with a less likelihood of testing PSA in asymptomatic men. The only associated factor in the multivariable model was having access to PSA testing (odds ratio: 3.36 confidence interval 95% 1.54-7.30) p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: A low rate of PCP performs PCa-ED and using concepts outside evidence-based recommendations. A national program on PCa-ED and continuing medical education for PCP are a promising strategy to improve PCa-ED.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey about knowledge and skills of PCa-ED was delivered to PCP. Logistic regression analysis was conducted for the propensity of PCP to test prostatic specific antigen (PSA) on asymptomatic men.
RESULTS: The survey was completed by 170 PCP. Score on risk factors knowledge was 51.5 ± 15.7% a better score was not associated with conducting PCa-ED (p = 0.674). The 40.6% answered having an institutional program on PCa-ED and 86% having access to PSA testing. Testing PSA on asymptomatic men was found in 40%. Moreover, 61.2% do not performed any digital rectal examination for PCa-ED, and this was not associated with preventing factors such as lack of space, time, and assistance (p > 0.05). Fewer years in practice and being a family medicine resident were associated with a less likelihood of testing PSA in asymptomatic men. The only associated factor in the multivariable model was having access to PSA testing (odds ratio: 3.36 confidence interval 95% 1.54-7.30) p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: A low rate of PCP performs PCa-ED and using concepts outside evidence-based recommendations. A national program on PCa-ED and continuing medical education for PCP are a promising strategy to improve PCa-ED.