Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation · 2020
The accuracy of prostate lesion localization in cognitive fusion.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Guang, Xiang Lihua, Wu Jian, Shao Hongda, Liu Hui, Ding Shisi, Wu Rong
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers in elderly men worldwide. Systematic biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasound remains the standard for PCa diagnosis; however, the false negative rate is 10-20%. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) allows PCa visualization with a more precise localization and a higher accuracy and specificity for the detection of PCa. The physician can mentally relocate the most appropriate area detected on the prebiopsy mpMRI, based on its zonal topography and anatomical landmarks, called cognitive fusion. Herein, we concentrated on the accuracy of PCa localization in cognitive fusion compared with MRI-TRUS fusion and explored the applied scope of cognitive fusion.
METHODS: Thirty-two eligible patients with 36 PCa lesions were recruited for our study. TRUS examinations and MRI-TRUS fusion procedures were performed by experienced operators. The cognitive fusion images were compared using the TRUS image in a MRI-TRUS fusion workstation.
RESULTS: Using cognitive fusion imaging, 86.1% of the lesions were accurately located by the senior sonographer and 69.4% of the lesions were accurately located by the junior sonographer. The maximum diameter and PI-RADS score of the lesions were important factors that affected the accuracy of cognitive fusion (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the lesions with high PI-RADS scores and the lesions with large diameters were more accurately located using cognitive fusion (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive fusion is a reliable technique with dependency on working experience, and its accuracy of locating suspicious lesions is consistent with MRI-TRUS fusion in patients with high PI-RADS score and large lesions.
METHODS: Thirty-two eligible patients with 36 PCa lesions were recruited for our study. TRUS examinations and MRI-TRUS fusion procedures were performed by experienced operators. The cognitive fusion images were compared using the TRUS image in a MRI-TRUS fusion workstation.
RESULTS: Using cognitive fusion imaging, 86.1% of the lesions were accurately located by the senior sonographer and 69.4% of the lesions were accurately located by the junior sonographer. The maximum diameter and PI-RADS score of the lesions were important factors that affected the accuracy of cognitive fusion (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the lesions with high PI-RADS scores and the lesions with large diameters were more accurately located using cognitive fusion (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive fusion is a reliable technique with dependency on working experience, and its accuracy of locating suspicious lesions is consistent with MRI-TRUS fusion in patients with high PI-RADS score and large lesions.