MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-313

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2010

Neurobehavioral evidence for the "Near-Miss" effect in pathological gamblers.

Habib Reza, Dixon Mark R

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The purpose of this translational study was twofold: (1) to contrast behavioral and brain activity between pathological and nonpathological gamblers, and (2) to examine differences as a function of the outcome of the spin of a slot machine, focusing predominately on the "Near-Miss"--when two reels stop on the same symbol, and that symbol is just above or below the payoff line on the third reel. Twenty-two participants (11 nonpathological; 11 pathological) completed the study by rating the closeness of various outcomes of slot machine displays (wins, losses, and near-misses) to a win. No behavioral differences were observed between groups of participants, however, differences in brain activity were found in the left midbrain, near the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area (SN / VTA). Near-miss outcomes uniquely activated brain regions associated with wins for the pathological gamblers and regions associated with losses for the nonpathological gamblers. Thus, near-miss outcomes on slot machines may contain both functional and neurological properties of wins for pathological gamblers. Such a translational approach to the study of gambling behavior may be considered an example that gives life to B. F. Skinner's conceptualization of the physiologist of the future.

Для цитирования: Habib Reza, Dixon Mark R. Neurobehavioral evidence for the "Near-Miss" effect in pathological gamblers.. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior. 2010. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-313.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.