MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1037/a0013010

Медицинская библиотека · Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2009

Strength of commitment language in motivational interviewing and gambling outcomes.

Hodgins David C, Ching Laurie E, McEwen Jamie

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The purpose of the present study was to examine the mechanisms by which the motivational interview (MI) is an effective treatment for pathological gambling. Forty MIs with pathological gamblers were transcribed and coded for language content and strength of expression. As hypothesized, participants who expressed stronger commitment to change their gambling behavior during the MI exhibited better gambling outcomes over 12 months than did those who expressed weaker commitment or no commitment to change their gambling behavior during the MI. Contrary to expectation, commitment strength in the latter part of the MI was not a stronger predictor of gambling outcome. Expression of desire, ability, need, reasons, and readiness for change were not predictive of outcome. Ability and readiness were associated with commitment. This study has important implications for clinical monitoring of client treatment success and for improving the MI. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

Для цитирования: Hodgins David C, Ching Laurie E, McEwen Jamie. Strength of commitment language in motivational interviewing and gambling outcomes.. Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors. 2009. DOI: 10.1037/a0013010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.