MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bjo.2006.108688

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of ophthalmology · 2007

Gonioscopy findings and prevalence of occludable angles in a Burmese population: the Meiktila Eye Study.

Casson R J, Newland H S, Muecke J, McGovern S, Abraham L M, Shein W K, Selva D, Aung T

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: To determine the prevalence of preglaucomatous angle-closure disease in central Myanmar.

METHODS

A population-based survey of inhabitants >or=40 years in the Meiktila District was carried out; 2481 subjects were identified, 2076 participated and 2060 underwent gonioscopy of at least one eye. Eyes with angles traditionally described as "occludable" were recorded as primary angle-closure suspects (PACS); eyes with PACS and peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS), or an increased intraocular pressure but without primary angle-closure glaucoma, were recorded as primary angle closure (PAC).

RESULTS

The prevalence of PACS in at least one eye was 5.7% (95% CI 4.72 to 6.62); prevalence increased with age and was more common in women (p<0.001). The prevalence of PAC in at least one eye was 1.50% (95% CI 1.47 to 1.53). All participants with PAS had at least 90 degrees of closure (range 90-360 degrees).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of preglaucomatous angle-closure disease (PACS and PAC) in this population was 5.7% and 1.5%, respectively. PACS was more common in women, and its prevalence increased with age.

Для цитирования: Casson R J, Newland H S, Muecke J, McGovern S, Abraham L M, Shein W K, Selva D, Aung T. Gonioscopy findings and prevalence of occludable angles in a Burmese population: the Meiktila Eye Study.. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2007. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.108688.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.