Eye (London, England) · 2006
An evaluation of the darkroom prone provocative test in family members of primary angle closure glaucoma patients.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sihota R, Mohan S, Dada T, Gupta V, Pandey R M, Ghate D
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare ocular biometric parameters with darkroom prone provocative test (DRPPT) in family members of primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) patients.
METHODS: One hundred and forty-nine family members of 46 PACG patients underwent ocular examination included slit lamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, fundus examination using +90 D lens, Goldmann applanation tonometry, darkroom prone provocative test, perimetry on Humphrey's field analyzer II and optic disc evaluation using HRT II. Ultrasonic ocular biometry and the DRPPT were then performed. IOP>or=8 mmHg rise from baseline with iridocorneal touch was considered as a positive test.
RESULTS: Of the 149 family members examined, 55 (36.9%) were found to have PACG. Forty (72.7%) of these had subacute PACG and 15 (27.3%) were found to have chronic PACG. Thirty-nine (70.3%) of the affected members showed a positive DRPPT. Mean anterior chamber depth (ACD) was 2.03+/-0.3, 2.3+/-0.4, 2.7+/-0.3 mm (P=0.0001) and mean lens thickness was 4.41+/-0.39, 3.99+/-0.5, 3.93+/-0.4 mm (P=0.0001) in DRPPT positives, borderlines and negatives respectively. ROC curve (ACD) plotted showed cutoff value of 2.07 mm (sensitivity 88.57%) for screening.
CONCLUSION: Anterior chamber is shallowest, lens is thickest and axial length is shortest in affected and DRPPT positive, family members of PACG patients.
METHODS: One hundred and forty-nine family members of 46 PACG patients underwent ocular examination included slit lamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, fundus examination using +90 D lens, Goldmann applanation tonometry, darkroom prone provocative test, perimetry on Humphrey's field analyzer II and optic disc evaluation using HRT II. Ultrasonic ocular biometry and the DRPPT were then performed. IOP>or=8 mmHg rise from baseline with iridocorneal touch was considered as a positive test.
RESULTS: Of the 149 family members examined, 55 (36.9%) were found to have PACG. Forty (72.7%) of these had subacute PACG and 15 (27.3%) were found to have chronic PACG. Thirty-nine (70.3%) of the affected members showed a positive DRPPT. Mean anterior chamber depth (ACD) was 2.03+/-0.3, 2.3+/-0.4, 2.7+/-0.3 mm (P=0.0001) and mean lens thickness was 4.41+/-0.39, 3.99+/-0.5, 3.93+/-0.4 mm (P=0.0001) in DRPPT positives, borderlines and negatives respectively. ROC curve (ACD) plotted showed cutoff value of 2.07 mm (sensitivity 88.57%) for screening.
CONCLUSION: Anterior chamber is shallowest, lens is thickest and axial length is shortest in affected and DRPPT positive, family members of PACG patients.