MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00737-026-01723-0

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of women's mental health · 2026

The evidence base of interventions to treat antenatal depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Laijawala Riddhi, Priestley Kristi, Bind Rebecca, Hazelgrove Katie, Rebecchini Lavinia, Kirkpatrick Madeline, Mancino Francesca, Sangha Samrina, Biaggi Alessandra, Godara Malvika, Buss Claudia, Entringer Sonja, Woods Anthony, Dazzan Paola, Cattaneo Annamaria, M Pariante Carmine

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Antenatal depression (AD) is a mental health condition estimated to affect close to 30% of pregnant people globally. The importance of treating depression in pregnancy is underscored by its downstream impact on both maternal and infant biopsychosocial outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birthweight, and postnatal depression. Despite these outcomes, only 20% of women experiencing AD receive appropriate and timely support and treatment. This meta-analysis is a comprehensive synthesis of RCTs evaluating psychological and non-psychological interventions to treat antenatal depression, conducted as part of the HappyMums project.

METHODS

Studies were sourced from PubMed, Embase Medline and MIDIRS (via OVID), and were included if they were (a) randomized controlled trials, (b) with pregnant people with, or at risk for depression, (c) consisted of an intervention, and (d) published in English. To estimate efficacy, Standardized Mean Differences (SMDS) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals using the post- intervention Ms and SDs of both the intervention and control groups. The I2 statistic was used as an indicator of variation between studies. Analyses were conducted using the software R Studio.

RESULTS

In total, 115 studies were included in the analysis. The pooled effect size of all interventions, compared with all pooled control arms, showed a clear therapeutic effect (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI 0.48; 0.83), although the between-study heterogeneity variance was high (τ2 = 0.78, 95% CI 0.7;1.3). After accounting for outliers, the pooled effect size across 94 treatment arms was still SMD = 0.5 (95% CI, 0.42, 0.56). No significant subgroup differences were found by intervention type and format, or measure used.

CONCLUSION

There are numerous interventions that, on average, are moderately effective in reducing depressive symptomology in pregnancy. Future research should be aimed at addressing how to personalise the choice of treatment and improve treatment outcomes for the individual pregnant person.

Для цитирования: Laijawala Riddhi, Priestley Kristi, Bind Rebecca, Hazelgrove Katie, Rebecchini Lavinia, Kirkpatrick Madeline, Mancino Francesca, Sangha Samrina, Biaggi Alessandra, Godara Malvika, Buss Claudia, Entringer Sonja, Woods Anthony, Dazzan Paola, Cattaneo Annamaria, M Pariante Carmine. The evidence base of interventions to treat antenatal depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. Archives of women's mental health. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00737-026-01723-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.