Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026
Primary calcification of hydrophilic acrylic lenses in a large population: incidence and outcomes of lens exchange procedures.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kazakos Dimitris, Venter Jan A, Hannan Stephen J, Teenan David, Cooper David R, Schallhorn Steven C, Berry Colin W, Hannan Noelle C, Raju Dasi, Schallhorn Julie M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of primary opacification and analyze the outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) exchange procedures.
SETTING: Private clinics, United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
METHODS: Electronic charts of all patients implanted with LENTIS lenses between 2010 and 2015 were reviewed, and the incidence of opacification was calculated. The data of patients who developed opacification were compared with those who did not. In eyes requiring IOL exchange due to opacification, visual and refractive outcomes of the last available postexchange visit were analyzed. The analysis was performed separately for eyes with multifocal and monofocal secondary IOLs.
RESULTS: 47 171 LENTIS IOLs were implanted of which 2426 (5.1%) opacified. Of the opacified lenses, 1568 (3.3% of the whole cohort) required an IOL exchange. The mean time from primary treatment to opacification diagnosis was 6.9 ± 2.2 years. Patients who developed opacification had a higher prevalence of preoperative myopia. Of all eyes requiring an IOL exchange, the secondary IOL was monofocal in 43.0% and multifocal in 57.0% of eyes. Postexchange corrected visual acuity was 0.00 ± 0.13 logMAR (20/20) in eyes with monofocal secondary IOLs and -0.02 ± 0.08 logMAR (20/20 +1 ) in eyes with multifocal secondary IOLs. The final anatomical position of the secondary IOL was as follows: in-the-bag fixation 67.9%, ciliary sulcus fixation 30.1%, iris-claw fixation 0.6%, and iris suturing or scleral fixation 1.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Exchange of opacified IOL was performed safely in most of the patients who developed opacification, including those with prior Nd:YAG capsulotomy, with good visual and refractive outcomes.
SETTING: Private clinics, United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
METHODS: Electronic charts of all patients implanted with LENTIS lenses between 2010 and 2015 were reviewed, and the incidence of opacification was calculated. The data of patients who developed opacification were compared with those who did not. In eyes requiring IOL exchange due to opacification, visual and refractive outcomes of the last available postexchange visit were analyzed. The analysis was performed separately for eyes with multifocal and monofocal secondary IOLs.
RESULTS: 47 171 LENTIS IOLs were implanted of which 2426 (5.1%) opacified. Of the opacified lenses, 1568 (3.3% of the whole cohort) required an IOL exchange. The mean time from primary treatment to opacification diagnosis was 6.9 ± 2.2 years. Patients who developed opacification had a higher prevalence of preoperative myopia. Of all eyes requiring an IOL exchange, the secondary IOL was monofocal in 43.0% and multifocal in 57.0% of eyes. Postexchange corrected visual acuity was 0.00 ± 0.13 logMAR (20/20) in eyes with monofocal secondary IOLs and -0.02 ± 0.08 logMAR (20/20 +1 ) in eyes with multifocal secondary IOLs. The final anatomical position of the secondary IOL was as follows: in-the-bag fixation 67.9%, ciliary sulcus fixation 30.1%, iris-claw fixation 0.6%, and iris suturing or scleral fixation 1.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Exchange of opacified IOL was performed safely in most of the patients who developed opacification, including those with prior Nd:YAG capsulotomy, with good visual and refractive outcomes.