MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00004728-200301000-00014

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of computer assisted tomography · 2003

Usefulness of electron beam tomography in the prone position for detecting atrial thrombi in chronic atrial fibrillation.

Tani Tomomitsu, Yamakami Shoji, Matsushita Toyoaki, Okamoto Mitsuhiro, Toyama Junji, Suzuki Shogo, Fukutomi Tatsuya, Itoh Makoto

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We compared the usefulness of electron beam tomography (EBT) in the prone position relative to that in the supine position for detecting atrial thrombi.

METHODS

We studied 96 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, of whom 71 were scanned in the supine position and 25 were scanned in the prone position. Electron beam tomography was performed twice after contrast medium injection to obtain early- and late-phase images.

RESULTS

Filling defects were detected in 13 patients in the supine position by EBT. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed a thrombus in the region of the filling defect in 9 patients. In 4 patients, filling defects in the left atrial appendage were not confirmed as thrombi by TEE. Filling defects were detected in 4 patients in the prone position, all of which were confirmed as thrombi by TEE.

CONCLUSION

Electron beam tomography in the prone position is an effective technique for reducing false-positive results in the detection of atrial thrombi.

Для цитирования: Tani Tomomitsu, Yamakami Shoji, Matsushita Toyoaki, Okamoto Mitsuhiro, Toyama Junji, Suzuki Shogo, Fukutomi Tatsuya, Itoh Makoto. Usefulness of electron beam tomography in the prone position for detecting atrial thrombi in chronic atrial fibrillation.. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2003. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200301000-00014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.