American journal of ophthalmology · 2025
Capsular Tension Ring Use in High Myopic Eyes Undergoing Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chang Yu-Min, Chien Ke-Hung, Wu Chi-Jung
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of capsular tension ring (CTR) implantation on refractive outcomes, intraocular lens (IOL) stability, and postoperative complications in high myopic patients undergoing cataract surgery.
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through March 2025 identified studies comparing cataract surgery with and without CTR implantation in high myopic eyes. The primary outcome was prediction refractive error (PE). Secondary outcomes included absolute refractive error (AE), postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), IOL decentration, anterior chamber depth (ACD), posterior capsular opacification (PCO), and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates. Random-effects meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were performed.
RESULTS: Nine studies (4 randomized controlled trials and 5 cohort studies; 846 eyes) were included. CTR implantation did not significantly affect PE (mean difference [MD], 0.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07 to 0.08; P = .93) or postoperative CDVA (MD, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.06; P = 1.00). However, CTR significantly reduced AE (MD, -0.12; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.05; P = .001) and IOL decentration (MD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01; P = .004).No covariates significantly influenced PE in meta-regression.
CONCLUSIONS: CTR implantation appears to modestly improve refractive predictability and IOL stability in high myopic eyes without compromising postoperative visual acuity. However, given the limited evidence base and small effect sizes, these findings should be interpreted with caution. CTR implantation may be considered in selected myopic cases with suspected zonular weakness or large capsular bags where additional capsular stability is desired.
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through March 2025 identified studies comparing cataract surgery with and without CTR implantation in high myopic eyes. The primary outcome was prediction refractive error (PE). Secondary outcomes included absolute refractive error (AE), postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), IOL decentration, anterior chamber depth (ACD), posterior capsular opacification (PCO), and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates. Random-effects meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were performed.
RESULTS: Nine studies (4 randomized controlled trials and 5 cohort studies; 846 eyes) were included. CTR implantation did not significantly affect PE (mean difference [MD], 0.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07 to 0.08; P = .93) or postoperative CDVA (MD, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.06; P = 1.00). However, CTR significantly reduced AE (MD, -0.12; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.05; P = .001) and IOL decentration (MD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01; P = .004).No covariates significantly influenced PE in meta-regression.
CONCLUSIONS: CTR implantation appears to modestly improve refractive predictability and IOL stability in high myopic eyes without compromising postoperative visual acuity. However, given the limited evidence base and small effect sizes, these findings should be interpreted with caution. CTR implantation may be considered in selected myopic cases with suspected zonular weakness or large capsular bags where additional capsular stability is desired.