[Pacing mode influence on morbidity and mortality].

It is widely believed that physiologic pacing (defined as atrial or atrioventricular synchronous pacing) reduces cardiac morbidity and mortality and is associated with improved quality of life compared to ventricular pacing. In this review we present data from three large prospective trials (PASE, CTOPP, MOST) comparing physiologic pacing to ventricular pacing. The prospective trials report that physiologic pacing is associated with a reduced risk of developing chronic atrial fibrillation over time and improved quality of life in patients with sinus node disease compared to ventricular pacing. However, these trials failed to demonstrate that physiologic pacing reduces heart failure, thromboembolism, or cardiac death compared to ventricular pacing. Based on the available clinical trials, physiologic pacing is not indicated in patients with a short life expectancy. Physiologic pacing should be considered for younger patients (age < 75 years), patients likely to be pacemaker dependent, and patients for whom maintenance of sinus rhythm is desirable, i.e., patients with ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction who are most likely to be severely symptomatic if AV synchrony is lost.