Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2000
Bimodal RR interval distribution in chronic atrial fibrillation: impact of dual atrioventricular nodal physiology on long-term rate control after catheter ablation of the posterior atrionodal input.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tebbenjohanns J, Schumacher B, Korte T, Niehaus M, Pfeiffer D
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter modification of the AV node in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited by an unpredictable decrease of the ventricular rate and a high incidence of permanent AV block. A bimodal RR histogram has been suggested to serve as a predictor for successful outcome but the corresponding AV node properties have never been characterized. We hypothesized that a bimodal histogram indicates dual AV nodal physiology and predicts a better outcome after AV node modification in chronic AF.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were prospectively subdivided into two groups according to the RR histogram of 24-hour ECG monitoring. Before to RF ablation, internal cardioversion and programmed stimulation were performed. Among the 22 patients (group I) with a bimodal RR histogram, dual AV nodal physiology was found in 17 (77%) patients. Ablation significantly decreased ventricular rate with loss of the peak of short RR cycles after ablation (mean and maximal ventricular rates: 32% and 35% rate reduction, respectively; P < 0.01). In 15 patients with a unimodal RR histogram (group II), dual AV nodal physiology was found in 2 (13%), and rate reductions were 16% and 17%, respectively. At 6 months, 3 (14%) patients in group I and 6 (40%) in group II underwent elective AV nodal ablation with pacemaker implantation due to intolerable rapid ventricular response to AF.
CONCLUSION: Bimodal RR interval distribution during chronic AF suggests the presence of dual AV nodal physiology and predicts a better outcome of RF ablation of the posterior atrionodal input.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were prospectively subdivided into two groups according to the RR histogram of 24-hour ECG monitoring. Before to RF ablation, internal cardioversion and programmed stimulation were performed. Among the 22 patients (group I) with a bimodal RR histogram, dual AV nodal physiology was found in 17 (77%) patients. Ablation significantly decreased ventricular rate with loss of the peak of short RR cycles after ablation (mean and maximal ventricular rates: 32% and 35% rate reduction, respectively; P < 0.01). In 15 patients with a unimodal RR histogram (group II), dual AV nodal physiology was found in 2 (13%), and rate reductions were 16% and 17%, respectively. At 6 months, 3 (14%) patients in group I and 6 (40%) in group II underwent elective AV nodal ablation with pacemaker implantation due to intolerable rapid ventricular response to AF.
CONCLUSION: Bimodal RR interval distribution during chronic AF suggests the presence of dual AV nodal physiology and predicts a better outcome of RF ablation of the posterior atrionodal input.