European heart journal. Case reports · 2025
The challenge of secondary cardiovascular prevention in very high Lipoprotein (a) level: a case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
D'Amuri Andrea, Di Gangi Pietro, Pagani Mauro, Lettieri Corrado
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: While advances in technology and procedural techniques have significantly improved outcomes post-PCI, two pharmacological strategies have gained particular attention for their effectiveness in reducing long-term cardiovascular (CV) risk: anti-platelet therapies and lipid-lowering therapies (LLT). The 10-year recurrence risk for major CV events remains as high as 10-30%, due to various pathophysiological pathways collectively known as residual risk (RR), even with optimal CV risk factor management after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). RR includes factors such as elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], triglycerides, pro-thrombotic states, hyperglycemia, and persistent subclinical arterial inflammation.
AIMS: This case highlights the challenge of managing a patient with multiple recurrent cardiac ischaemic events and in-stent restenosis, despite good medical therapy and no other significant CV risk factors except for markedly elevated Lp(a) levels.
CONCLUSION: Three critical aspects of daily practice emerge from our observation. First, Lp(a) is a valuable parameter for CV risk stratification in primary prevention. Second, measurement of Lp(a) post-CV event may provide valuable information on the risk of ischaemic recurrence, influencing decisions regarding long-term dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT). Finally, this case illustrates the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in managing patients with very high cardiovascular risk. Close collaboration between cardiologists and lipidologists facilitated the identification of a rare lipid disorder and the decision to pursue lipoprotein apheresis, an intensive but effective treatment option for lipid metabolism disorders lacking conventional medical therapy.
AIMS: This case highlights the challenge of managing a patient with multiple recurrent cardiac ischaemic events and in-stent restenosis, despite good medical therapy and no other significant CV risk factors except for markedly elevated Lp(a) levels.
CONCLUSION: Three critical aspects of daily practice emerge from our observation. First, Lp(a) is a valuable parameter for CV risk stratification in primary prevention. Second, measurement of Lp(a) post-CV event may provide valuable information on the risk of ischaemic recurrence, influencing decisions regarding long-term dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT). Finally, this case illustrates the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in managing patients with very high cardiovascular risk. Close collaboration between cardiologists and lipidologists facilitated the identification of a rare lipid disorder and the decision to pursue lipoprotein apheresis, an intensive but effective treatment option for lipid metabolism disorders lacking conventional medical therapy.