Community genetics · 2007
Barriers to access: results from focus groups to identify genetic service needs in the community.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Beene-Harris Rosalyn Y, Wang Catharine, Bach Janice V
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: In efforts to prepare for implications of genomic advances, a needs assessment was undertaken from 2000 to 2002 by the Michigan Department of Community Health to develop a comprehensive state plan for genetic services. This paper reports on the access barriers to genetic services identified from focus groups conducted with members of the community and genetic service providers.
METHODS: Included in this study were the following five target groups: a sickle cell anemia parent support group, a Native American student group, parents of children with birth defects or other special health care needs, adults with genetic conditions, and genetic service providers from the statewide genetic counselors' association. Discussions of all groups were audio taped, transcribed and analyzed using content analysis.
RESULTS: Individual barriers to access identified included lack of awareness of personal risk, lack of knowledge of genetic services and resources, and lack of trust/fear of discrimination. Institutional barriers to access identified included provider lack of knowledge and awareness of genetic services, lack of workforce, coordination of care, cost and insurance, and location from services.
CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to access cut across overlapping dimensions and overcoming these barriers will require solutions that target multiple dimensions in order to be effective.
METHODS: Included in this study were the following five target groups: a sickle cell anemia parent support group, a Native American student group, parents of children with birth defects or other special health care needs, adults with genetic conditions, and genetic service providers from the statewide genetic counselors' association. Discussions of all groups were audio taped, transcribed and analyzed using content analysis.
RESULTS: Individual barriers to access identified included lack of awareness of personal risk, lack of knowledge of genetic services and resources, and lack of trust/fear of discrimination. Institutional barriers to access identified included provider lack of knowledge and awareness of genetic services, lack of workforce, coordination of care, cost and insurance, and location from services.
CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to access cut across overlapping dimensions and overcoming these barriers will require solutions that target multiple dimensions in order to be effective.