The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
A Genetic Assessment of Dopamine Agonist-Induced Impulse Control Disorder in Patients With Prolactinoma.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sahin Serdar, Sudutan Tugce, Kavla Yasin, Durcan Emre, Özogul Yeliz Yagiz, Poyraz Burc Cagri, Sayitoglu Muge, Ozkaya Hande Mefkure, Kadioglu Pinar
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Dopamine agonist (DA)-induced impulse control disorder (ICD) represents a group of behavioral disorders that are increasingly recognized in patients with prolactinoma.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the genetic component of the underlying mechanism of DA-induced ICD.
METHODS: Patients with prolactinoma receiving dopamine agonist (cabergoline) treatment were included in the study. These patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who developed ICD due to DA and patients who did not. Patients were evaluated for polymorphisms of the DRD1, DRD3, COMT, DDC, GRIN2B, TPH2, OPRK1, OPRM1, SLC6A4, SLC6A3, HTR2A genes.
RESULTS: Of the 72 patients with prolactinoma using cabergoline, 20 were diagnosed with ICD. When patients with and without ICD were compared according to genotype frequencies, OPRK1/rs702764, DRD3/rs6280, HTR2A/rs6313, SLC6A4/rs7224199, GRIN2B/rs7301328, TPH2/rs7305115, COMT/rs4680, DRD1/rs4532 polymorphisms significantly increased in patients with DA-induced ICD.
CONCLUSION: Our results show that multiple neurotransmission systems affect DA-induced ICD in patients with prolactinoma.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the genetic component of the underlying mechanism of DA-induced ICD.
METHODS: Patients with prolactinoma receiving dopamine agonist (cabergoline) treatment were included in the study. These patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who developed ICD due to DA and patients who did not. Patients were evaluated for polymorphisms of the DRD1, DRD3, COMT, DDC, GRIN2B, TPH2, OPRK1, OPRM1, SLC6A4, SLC6A3, HTR2A genes.
RESULTS: Of the 72 patients with prolactinoma using cabergoline, 20 were diagnosed with ICD. When patients with and without ICD were compared according to genotype frequencies, OPRK1/rs702764, DRD3/rs6280, HTR2A/rs6313, SLC6A4/rs7224199, GRIN2B/rs7301328, TPH2/rs7305115, COMT/rs4680, DRD1/rs4532 polymorphisms significantly increased in patients with DA-induced ICD.
CONCLUSION: Our results show that multiple neurotransmission systems affect DA-induced ICD in patients with prolactinoma.