Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2015
Preoperative Versus Intraoperative Subpterygial Mitomycin C Injection for Prevention of Pterygium Recurrence.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mandour Sameh Saad, Marey Hatem M, Farahat Hassan G, Mohamed Hala Mosa
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate postoperative outcome and recurrence rate after primary pterygium excision using preoperative versus intraoperative subpterygial Mitomycin C (MMC) injection.
METHODS: Eighty-three eyes with primary pterygium were divided into 2 groups. Group A (35 eyes) was operated upon with pterygium excision 5 min after subpterygial injection of 0.1 mL 0.015% MMC in the same operative setting. Group B (48 eyes) was operated upon with pterygium excision 1 month after subpterygial injection of the same amount and concentration of MMC as in group A. Pterygium regrowth over the cornea for 1 mm or more was considered as a recurrence.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 30.66±4.48 months in group A and 29.5±4.3 months in group B. In group A, the reported recurrence rate was 5.7%, while it was 4.2% in group B. No serious postoperative complications were reported. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the recurrence rate as well as the complication rate.
CONCLUSION: Both techniques proved to be effective in reducing the recurrence rate after excision of primary nasal pterygium with minimal postoperative complications, with no need of a second surgery for patients in group A.
METHODS: Eighty-three eyes with primary pterygium were divided into 2 groups. Group A (35 eyes) was operated upon with pterygium excision 5 min after subpterygial injection of 0.1 mL 0.015% MMC in the same operative setting. Group B (48 eyes) was operated upon with pterygium excision 1 month after subpterygial injection of the same amount and concentration of MMC as in group A. Pterygium regrowth over the cornea for 1 mm or more was considered as a recurrence.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 30.66±4.48 months in group A and 29.5±4.3 months in group B. In group A, the reported recurrence rate was 5.7%, while it was 4.2% in group B. No serious postoperative complications were reported. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the recurrence rate as well as the complication rate.
CONCLUSION: Both techniques proved to be effective in reducing the recurrence rate after excision of primary nasal pterygium with minimal postoperative complications, with no need of a second surgery for patients in group A.