Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2002
Suppressed cutaneous endothelial vascular control and hemodynamic changes in paretic extremities with edema in the extremities of patients with hemiplegia.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Jong-Shyan, Yang Chih Fang, Liaw Mei-Yon, Wong May-Kuen
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate peripheral circulatory function and its underlying mechanisms in the paretic upper extremity after a stroke.
DESIGN: Case-control study.
SETTING: A department of physical medicine and rehabilitation in Taiwan.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 53 hemiplegic patients (28 men, 25 women; mean age +/- standard deviation; 58.2+/-3.8y) were studied. Subjects were divided into edema and nonedema groups. The edema group included 29 hemiplegic patients with edematous paretic upper extremities. Twenty-four hemiplegic patients in the nonedema group did not suffer from limb edema in the paretic upper extremity.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cutaneous microvascular perfusion responses to 3 grade levels of iontophoretically applied 1% acetylcholine (ACh), 1% ACh plus 1% N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), and 1% sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in the skin of subjects' forearms were determined by laser Doppler perfusion measurements. Moreover, hemodynamic characteristics in the arterial and venous vessels were measured by impedance plethysmography.
RESULTS: Resting arterial inflow and venous capacity, tone, and outflow in paretic extremities did not significantly differ from nonparetic extremities, but the hyperemic arterial inflow was lower in paretic extremities than in nonparetic extremities, and paretic extremities were associated with lower ACh- and ACh plus L-NMMA-induced cutaneous perfusions than nonparetic extremities. ACh-induced cutaneous perfusions also decreased much more significantly in edematous paretic extremities than in nonedematous paretic extremities, and skin vascular responses to SNP do not differ significantly between paretic and nonparetic extremities.
CONCLUSION: Cutaneous microcirculatory function in the paretic upper extremity after stroke may be impaired. The impairment may occur because of decreased endothelium-dependent dilation in skin vasculature. Dysfunction in cutaneous microcirculation tends to be more pronounced in the edematous than in the nonedematous extremities.
DESIGN: Case-control study.
SETTING: A department of physical medicine and rehabilitation in Taiwan.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 53 hemiplegic patients (28 men, 25 women; mean age +/- standard deviation; 58.2+/-3.8y) were studied. Subjects were divided into edema and nonedema groups. The edema group included 29 hemiplegic patients with edematous paretic upper extremities. Twenty-four hemiplegic patients in the nonedema group did not suffer from limb edema in the paretic upper extremity.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cutaneous microvascular perfusion responses to 3 grade levels of iontophoretically applied 1% acetylcholine (ACh), 1% ACh plus 1% N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), and 1% sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in the skin of subjects' forearms were determined by laser Doppler perfusion measurements. Moreover, hemodynamic characteristics in the arterial and venous vessels were measured by impedance plethysmography.
RESULTS: Resting arterial inflow and venous capacity, tone, and outflow in paretic extremities did not significantly differ from nonparetic extremities, but the hyperemic arterial inflow was lower in paretic extremities than in nonparetic extremities, and paretic extremities were associated with lower ACh- and ACh plus L-NMMA-induced cutaneous perfusions than nonparetic extremities. ACh-induced cutaneous perfusions also decreased much more significantly in edematous paretic extremities than in nonedematous paretic extremities, and skin vascular responses to SNP do not differ significantly between paretic and nonparetic extremities.
CONCLUSION: Cutaneous microcirculatory function in the paretic upper extremity after stroke may be impaired. The impairment may occur because of decreased endothelium-dependent dilation in skin vasculature. Dysfunction in cutaneous microcirculation tends to be more pronounced in the edematous than in the nonedematous extremities.