AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2008
Transluminal angioplasty and stenting for intracranial vertebrobasilar occlusive lesions in acute stroke patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Imai K, Mori T, Izumoto H, Kunieda T, Takabatake N, Yamamoto S, Watanabe M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The clinical outcome is often poor in acute stroke patients with a serious neurological status due to occlusive lesions of the intracranial vertebral and/or basilar artery (IVBA). The purpose of this study was to investigate retrospectively the clinical features and outcome of acute stroke patients who underwent transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting (TAS) for occlusive lesions of the IVBA and to clarify the prerequisites for improvement of outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1690 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to our institution, TAS for occlusive lesions of the IVBA was performed within 7 days after stroke onset in 28 patients. We classified these patients into 2 groups, those with total occlusion (occlusion group) and those with a high-grade stenosis (stenosis group), and compared the preprocedural neurologic status (severe: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale >20), the rate of technical success, major procedure-related complications, subacute occlusion of the treated vessel, and favorable clinical outcome (0-2 points on a 3-month modified Rankin Scale) between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: In the occlusion group (n = 16) and stenosis group (n = 12), a severe preprocedural neurologic status was seen in 13 and 1 patients, respectively (81% versus 8%; P = .0001); technical success was achieved in 13 and 11 patients, respectively (81% versus 92%; P value not significant [NS]); complications occurred in 6 and 0 patients, respectively (38% versus 0%; P < .05); subacute occlusion was seen in 4 and 1 patients, respectively (25% versus 8%; P = NS); and a favorable clinical outcome was obtained in 3 and 9 patients, respectively (19% versus 75%; P < .01).
CONCLUSION: The clinical outcome of patients who underwent TAS for total occlusion of the IVBA was poor. Improvement of outcome requires reduction of procedure-related complications and subacute occlusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1690 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to our institution, TAS for occlusive lesions of the IVBA was performed within 7 days after stroke onset in 28 patients. We classified these patients into 2 groups, those with total occlusion (occlusion group) and those with a high-grade stenosis (stenosis group), and compared the preprocedural neurologic status (severe: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale >20), the rate of technical success, major procedure-related complications, subacute occlusion of the treated vessel, and favorable clinical outcome (0-2 points on a 3-month modified Rankin Scale) between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: In the occlusion group (n = 16) and stenosis group (n = 12), a severe preprocedural neurologic status was seen in 13 and 1 patients, respectively (81% versus 8%; P = .0001); technical success was achieved in 13 and 11 patients, respectively (81% versus 92%; P value not significant [NS]); complications occurred in 6 and 0 patients, respectively (38% versus 0%; P < .05); subacute occlusion was seen in 4 and 1 patients, respectively (25% versus 8%; P = NS); and a favorable clinical outcome was obtained in 3 and 9 patients, respectively (19% versus 75%; P < .01).
CONCLUSION: The clinical outcome of patients who underwent TAS for total occlusion of the IVBA was poor. Improvement of outcome requires reduction of procedure-related complications and subacute occlusion.