International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
Barriers to Regular Eye Examination in Individuals with Diabetes at a Tertiary Diabetes Centre in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Albakri Yazan J, Aldabbagh Fatema A, Sabbagh Hashem M, Khashman Mohammad K, Farahid Oraib, Ali Rasha M, Gharaibeh Almutez M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of vision impairment and a significant complication of diabetes mellitus, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to identify the barriers affecting diabetic retinopathy screening among people with diabetes mellitus.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted between April and October 2024 at the National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics. Data collection was performed using a structured, validated electronic questionnaire adapted from previous studies. Sample size calculation was carried out before data collection. Data were collected using a structured electronic questionnaire. A total of 998 responses were included in the study. The collected data incorporated sociodemographic characteristics, diabetes history, screening practices, and reported barriers. Descriptive and categorical data analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Of 998 participants, 82% were over 50 years old, 79% had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 30% had never had an eye examination. Diabetic retinopathy was diagnosed in 12%. The main barriers to regular attendance among those previously screened (699) were as follows: lack of awareness of its importance (11%), believing that being asymptomatic made screening unnecessary (19%), and transportation difficulties (14%). Among those never screened (299), 56% lacked awareness, 62% believed being asymptomatic negates the need for screening, and 13% faced transportation difficulties. Age > 50 years, higher educational level, availability of health insurance, longer duration of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and HbA1c > 7% were significantly associated with prior screening (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Public health strategies should enhance the education provided to people and physician-person communication and remove logistical obstacles to improve screening compliance.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted between April and October 2024 at the National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics. Data collection was performed using a structured, validated electronic questionnaire adapted from previous studies. Sample size calculation was carried out before data collection. Data were collected using a structured electronic questionnaire. A total of 998 responses were included in the study. The collected data incorporated sociodemographic characteristics, diabetes history, screening practices, and reported barriers. Descriptive and categorical data analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Of 998 participants, 82% were over 50 years old, 79% had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 30% had never had an eye examination. Diabetic retinopathy was diagnosed in 12%. The main barriers to regular attendance among those previously screened (699) were as follows: lack of awareness of its importance (11%), believing that being asymptomatic made screening unnecessary (19%), and transportation difficulties (14%). Among those never screened (299), 56% lacked awareness, 62% believed being asymptomatic negates the need for screening, and 13% faced transportation difficulties. Age > 50 years, higher educational level, availability of health insurance, longer duration of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and HbA1c > 7% were significantly associated with prior screening (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Public health strategies should enhance the education provided to people and physician-person communication and remove logistical obstacles to improve screening compliance.