Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 2024
Factors Predicting the Need for Re-treatment After Laser Refractive Surgery in Patients With Mixed Astigmatism.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sorkin Nir, Kaiserman Igor, Kayal Mohamad, Levinger Eliya, Mashour Raneen Shehadeh, Sela Tzahi, Munzer Gur, Mimouni Michael
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To identify risk factors that increase the likelihood of re-treatment following refractive surgery in patients with mixed astigmatism.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study including patients who underwent either laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) between 2000 and 2019 and had mixed astigmatism (spherical error of +0.50 D or greater and spherical equivalent of less than 0.00 diopters [D]). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent re-treatments during the study period.
RESULTS: Overall, 785 eyes (785 patients) were included. In total, 5.2% of the eyes (n = 41) underwent re-treatment. The re-treatment group was more likely to have preoperative high astigmatism (80.5% vs 48.3%, P < .001), moderate to high hyperopia (36.6% vs 22.3%, P = .035), and to have undergone surgery earlier during the study period (P < .001). They were also more likely to have undergone surgery using the Wave-Light EX200 rather than the EX500 laser platform (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) (P < .001), have a treated optical zone of 6 mm rather than 6.5 mm (P < .001 for both), and their maximum ablation depth was greater (P < .001). There was no difference between the re-treatment and control groups regarding procedure type (PRK vs LASIK). Binary logistic regression found preoperative high astigmatism (odds ratio = 3.97, P < .001) and the type of laser platform used (EX200, odds ratio = 7.78, P < .001) as the only independent factors associated with re-treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Re-treatment rates following correction of mixed astigmatism were 5.2% over 20 years. Use of a sixth-generation laser platform significantly reduced the risk of re-treatment. Presence of high astigmatism is a significant risk factor for re-treatment. There was no difference in retreatment risk between PRK and LASIK. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(2):e73-e78.].
METHODS: This was a retrospective study including patients who underwent either laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) between 2000 and 2019 and had mixed astigmatism (spherical error of +0.50 D or greater and spherical equivalent of less than 0.00 diopters [D]). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent re-treatments during the study period.
RESULTS: Overall, 785 eyes (785 patients) were included. In total, 5.2% of the eyes (n = 41) underwent re-treatment. The re-treatment group was more likely to have preoperative high astigmatism (80.5% vs 48.3%, P < .001), moderate to high hyperopia (36.6% vs 22.3%, P = .035), and to have undergone surgery earlier during the study period (P < .001). They were also more likely to have undergone surgery using the Wave-Light EX200 rather than the EX500 laser platform (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) (P < .001), have a treated optical zone of 6 mm rather than 6.5 mm (P < .001 for both), and their maximum ablation depth was greater (P < .001). There was no difference between the re-treatment and control groups regarding procedure type (PRK vs LASIK). Binary logistic regression found preoperative high astigmatism (odds ratio = 3.97, P < .001) and the type of laser platform used (EX200, odds ratio = 7.78, P < .001) as the only independent factors associated with re-treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Re-treatment rates following correction of mixed astigmatism were 5.2% over 20 years. Use of a sixth-generation laser platform significantly reduced the risk of re-treatment. Presence of high astigmatism is a significant risk factor for re-treatment. There was no difference in retreatment risk between PRK and LASIK. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(2):e73-e78.].