Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
Identifying patients with obesity from health administrative data: Diagnostic accuracy of surgical billing claims.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cusimano Maria C, Baxter Nancy N, Moineddin Rahim, Chiu Maria, Nguyen Lena, Aktar Suriya, Liu Ning, Simpson Andrea N, Johnson Christina, Ferguson Sarah E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Obesity (body mass index, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) is a predictor of patient outcomes across surgical disciplines, but is not accurately captured by diagnostic codes in administrative databases. The objective of this study was to determine the validity of surgeon and anaesthetist billing claims indicating that their patients had concurrent class III obesity (BMI > 40) as compared to patients' self-reported BMI.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of adult patients who had undergone major abdominopelvic, neck, and hip surgery in Ontario from 2011 to 2019, and had also reported their BMI on either the Canadian Community Health Survey or the Ontario Health Study. Physician billing claims for class III obesity were compared to self-reported BMI, and measures of diagnostic accuracy with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
RESULTS: We identified 52,515 patients who had undergone surgery (80.6% abdominopelvic; 19.4% neck/hip) with median age 57 years and median BMI 26 (range 15-108); 2189 patients (4.2%) reported a BMI > 40. When self-reported BMI was collected within 1 year of surgery, billing claims submitted by either the surgeon, surgical assistant, or anaesthetist had sensitivity 82.9% (95% CI 79.1-86.7), specificity 95.5% (95.0-96.0), positive predictive value 52.9% (50.1-58.5), and negative predictive value 98.9% (98.7-99.2) for the identification of BMI > 40. Positive predictive value for the identification of BMI > 30 was 95.4% (93.7-97.0).
CONCLUSION: Physician billing claims are specific and sensitive for the identification of patients with BMI > 40 undergoing surgery, enable accurate selection of a population with BMI > 30, and are valid for use in studies conducted with health administrative data.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of adult patients who had undergone major abdominopelvic, neck, and hip surgery in Ontario from 2011 to 2019, and had also reported their BMI on either the Canadian Community Health Survey or the Ontario Health Study. Physician billing claims for class III obesity were compared to self-reported BMI, and measures of diagnostic accuracy with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
RESULTS: We identified 52,515 patients who had undergone surgery (80.6% abdominopelvic; 19.4% neck/hip) with median age 57 years and median BMI 26 (range 15-108); 2189 patients (4.2%) reported a BMI > 40. When self-reported BMI was collected within 1 year of surgery, billing claims submitted by either the surgeon, surgical assistant, or anaesthetist had sensitivity 82.9% (95% CI 79.1-86.7), specificity 95.5% (95.0-96.0), positive predictive value 52.9% (50.1-58.5), and negative predictive value 98.9% (98.7-99.2) for the identification of BMI > 40. Positive predictive value for the identification of BMI > 30 was 95.4% (93.7-97.0).
CONCLUSION: Physician billing claims are specific and sensitive for the identification of patients with BMI > 40 undergoing surgery, enable accurate selection of a population with BMI > 30, and are valid for use in studies conducted with health administrative data.