MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India · 2000

Seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection in an infectious disease hospital.

Kulkarni M G, Kavishwar V S, Chogle A R, Parab V V, Aigal U, Koppikar G V

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIMS AND

OBJECTIVES

To analyse clinicopathological features of HIV infected patients admitted in an infectious disease hospital in Mumbai.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Retrospective study of 501 patients admitted from 1st September, 1996 to 28th February, 1998 and screened for HIV status out of clinical suspicion was carried out. HIV seropositivity was established by double confirmation of spot test results with microwell Elisa test.

RESULTS

HIV seropositivity was seen in 39.92%. Out of these 94% were adults with male preponderance and 96.5% had only HIV-1 infection. The significant clinical features in HIV positive patients were chronic diarrhea (51.5%), prolonged fever (41.5%) and history of exposure (34%). Pulmonary tuberculosis could be diagnosed in 19.5% of HIV positive patients. In patients with prolonged/recurrent jaundice HBsAg and HIV was noted as a coinfection within 10/42 cases tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing prevalence of HIV seropositivity was noted in patients admitted to an infectious disease hospital. Association of HIV infection with tuberculosis and in icteric cases with HBsAg was significant. The HIV screening should be carried out in patients with prolonged illness resistant to usual mode of treatment.

Для цитирования: Kulkarni M G, Kavishwar V S, Chogle A R, Parab V V, Aigal U, Koppikar G V. Seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection in an infectious disease hospital.. The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India. 2000.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.