Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023
Infliximab in neurosarcoidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chaiyanarm Siwakorn, Satiraphan Piraya, Apiraksattaykul Natnasak, Jitprapaikulsan Jiraporn, Owattanapanich Weerapat, Rungjirajittranon Tarinee, Nanthasi Witsarut
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and relapse rates in neurosarcoidosis patients administered infliximab.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases. The search included studies from their inception to March 2023. We included case-series studies with at least 10 neurosarcoidosis patients undergoing any treatment type. Studies were also required to report at least one of the following outcomes: response rate, overall survival rate, or relapse rate. This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A random-effects model facilitated the analysis of proportional treatment outcomes. Study quality was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale, while a funnel plot helped detect any publication bias.
RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 237 patients with neurosarcoidosis were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 184 (77.6%) received treatment with infliximab. The pooled proportion of patients showing clinical improvement after infliximab treatment was 0.74 (95% CI 0.64-0.84, I2 = 49.73%). Relapse rates, derived from four studies, stood at 0.38 (95% CI 0.22-0.55, I2 = 56.92%). Most studies reported successful tapering or cessation of corticosteroid dosage in patients receiving infliximab. Adverse effects were reported in 52 (29.4%) patients, of which 39 out of 54 events (72.2%) were linked to infections.
INTERPRETATION: Infliximab demonstrated potential improvement in clinical outcomes for patients with refractory neurosarcoidosis and showed potential for reducing the dosage of concurrent corticosteroids. However, a degree of relapse was observed, with infections being the primary concern for adverse events.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases. The search included studies from their inception to March 2023. We included case-series studies with at least 10 neurosarcoidosis patients undergoing any treatment type. Studies were also required to report at least one of the following outcomes: response rate, overall survival rate, or relapse rate. This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A random-effects model facilitated the analysis of proportional treatment outcomes. Study quality was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale, while a funnel plot helped detect any publication bias.
RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 237 patients with neurosarcoidosis were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 184 (77.6%) received treatment with infliximab. The pooled proportion of patients showing clinical improvement after infliximab treatment was 0.74 (95% CI 0.64-0.84, I2 = 49.73%). Relapse rates, derived from four studies, stood at 0.38 (95% CI 0.22-0.55, I2 = 56.92%). Most studies reported successful tapering or cessation of corticosteroid dosage in patients receiving infliximab. Adverse effects were reported in 52 (29.4%) patients, of which 39 out of 54 events (72.2%) were linked to infections.
INTERPRETATION: Infliximab demonstrated potential improvement in clinical outcomes for patients with refractory neurosarcoidosis and showed potential for reducing the dosage of concurrent corticosteroids. However, a degree of relapse was observed, with infections being the primary concern for adverse events.