Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2025
Videoconference-integrated, computer-assisted cognitive testing improves the remote assessment of processing speed and attention.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chapman Jodie E, Helmstaedter Christoph, Abbott David F, Pardoe Heath R, Vaughan David N, Jackson Graeme D, Tailby Chris, Australian Epilepsy Project Investigators
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Remote videoconference neuropsychological assessments offer opportunities that remain under-exploited. We aimed to evaluate teleneuropsychology (TeleNP)-suitable oral and digital versions of the Symbol Digit Modalities Task (SDMT) and Trail Making Test (TMT) - widely used measures of speed and attention - by comparing them to their written counterparts.
METHODS: Three-hundred and twenty-one Australian Epilepsy Project (AEP) adult participants with seizure disorders completed the written SDMT and TMT in-person. One-hundred and forty-four of these participants also completed the oral SDMT and TMT during a remote videoconference-based assessment while 177 completed a novel, examiner-administered digital SDMT analogous measure named Symbol Decoding and a novel digital TMT remotely via custom videoconference-based software.
RESULTS: Oral SDMT and digital Symbol Decoding strongly correlated with in-person written SDMT (r (133) = .77, p < .001 and r (126) = .76, p < .001, respectively). Oral TMT-B was only moderately associated (r (126) = .52, p < .001) with written TMT-B and, less strongly related to measures of sustained attention and spatial working memory than its written counterpart. Digital TMT better reproduced the written test's properties with improved association with written TMT-B (r (154) = .71, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Oral SDMT and digital Symbol Decoding are strongly correlated with in-person written SDMT. The digital TMT better captures the cognitive demands and performance characteristics of the in-person written form than does oral TMT. Videoconference-integrated digital tasks offer increased standardization and automation in administration and scoring and the potential for rich metadata, making them an attractive area for further development.
METHODS: Three-hundred and twenty-one Australian Epilepsy Project (AEP) adult participants with seizure disorders completed the written SDMT and TMT in-person. One-hundred and forty-four of these participants also completed the oral SDMT and TMT during a remote videoconference-based assessment while 177 completed a novel, examiner-administered digital SDMT analogous measure named Symbol Decoding and a novel digital TMT remotely via custom videoconference-based software.
RESULTS: Oral SDMT and digital Symbol Decoding strongly correlated with in-person written SDMT (r (133) = .77, p < .001 and r (126) = .76, p < .001, respectively). Oral TMT-B was only moderately associated (r (126) = .52, p < .001) with written TMT-B and, less strongly related to measures of sustained attention and spatial working memory than its written counterpart. Digital TMT better reproduced the written test's properties with improved association with written TMT-B (r (154) = .71, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Oral SDMT and digital Symbol Decoding are strongly correlated with in-person written SDMT. The digital TMT better captures the cognitive demands and performance characteristics of the in-person written form than does oral TMT. Videoconference-integrated digital tasks offer increased standardization and automation in administration and scoring and the potential for rich metadata, making them an attractive area for further development.