[Evaluation of 2 tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis regimens in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. The GECMEI Group].

OBJECTIVE

To assess the compliance, tolerance and efficacy of a short chemoprophylaxis regimen (IR) for tuberculosis using isoniazid (INH) plus rifampin (RIF) during 3 months versus a standard regimen (I) of isoniazid during 12 months in HIV positive patients.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Prospective, comparative, randomized and open clinical trial in four general hospitals and one prison hospital of Castilla-La Mancha. Prophylaxis was administered to PPD-positive patients and to anergic patients according to the CDC recommendations (1991). Patients were randomized in two treatment groups: regimen IR, isoniazid 300 mg daily and rifampin 600 mg daily; regimen I, isoniazid 300 mg during 12 months.

RESULTS

133 patients were included, 64 to regimen I and 69 to regimen IR. Regimen IR had a better tolerance with a 28% of adverse effects versus 55% in regimen I. Hepatotoxicity was more frequent in regimen I with a RR = 2.2 (CI 95% 1.23-4.01). Severe hepatotoxicity leading to treatment withdrawal was related to drug administration time and was more frequent in the 12 months regimen group. Short regimen showed a better compliance, without significant differences. Tuberculosis incidence rate was a 4.23 cases/100 persons--year for regimen I and 2.08 in regimen IR, with a relative risk for developing tuberculosis with regimen IR group of 0.51 (CI 95% 0.09-2.8) versus regimen I group, without statistical significance. Prison stay was associated to a significant risk for tuberculosis, regardless of both regimens (RR = 9.2 CI 95%, 1.06-80.2).

CONCLUSIONS

In HIV-infected patients with PPD(+) or anergic, regimen with IR is at least as effective as regimen I for preventing the development of tuberculous disease, and has less adverse effects.