MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.10267

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2003

Parotid gland surgery: 4-year review of 118 cases in an Asian population.

Lim Lynne Hsueh Yee, Chao Siew Shuen, Goh Christopher Hood Keng, Ng Chee Yung, Goh Yau Hong, Khin Lay Wai

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To determine the presentation and management of parotid lesions requiring excision in a largely Chinese Asian population.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 118 consecutive parotidectomies.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven percent were Warthin's tumor (WT), 33% pleomorphic adenoma (PA), 21% other benign disease (OBD), and 9% malignant tumor (MT). Mean age was significantly different between benign (51 years) and malignant (40 years) lesions. MT decreased above 50 years, but increased five times with pain and two times with a noninferior pole lesion. Sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for differentiating benign from MT = 78%, for WT =5 8%, for PA =82%, for OBD = 28%, and for MT = 38%. CT scans did not alter WT management. Facial nerve (FN) paresis was not associated with histology, tumor size, site, or parotidectomy type.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report documenting that most benign parotid tumors are WT and not PA. MT risk is greater in those less than 50 with pain and a noninferior pole lesion. Cystic lesions such as WT require great care in the evaluation of FNA findings.

Для цитирования: Lim Lynne Hsueh Yee, Chao Siew Shuen, Goh Christopher Hood Keng, Ng Chee Yung, Goh Yau Hong, Khin Lay Wai. Parotid gland surgery: 4-year review of 118 cases in an Asian population.. Head & neck. 2003. DOI: 10.1002/hed.10267.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.