Ophthalmic epidemiology · 2013
Uncorrected refractive error and presbyopia among junior high school teachers in Jakarta, Indonesia.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ehrlich Joshua R, Laoh Alex, Kourgialis Nick, Prasetyanti Widya, Zakiyah Rima, Faillace Silvana, Friedman David S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report on the frequency of observed refractive and accommodative errors among junior high school teachers in Jakarta, Indonesia, who participated in a Helen Keller International screening, refraction and spectacle distribution program.
METHODS: A total of 965 teachers from 19 schools were eligible for screening; those with uncorrected distance visual acuity (VA) ≤ 6/12-3 and teachers ≥ 35 years old with uncorrected end-point print size >Jaeger (J) 6 were referred. Autorefraction and subjective refraction were performed for teachers with confirmed decreased VA. Refractive error was considered present if sphere ≤-0.75 diopters (D), sphere ≥+0.25D or cylinder ≤-0.50 D resulted in ≥ 2 lines of improvement in VA. Presbyopia was considered present if an end-point print size >J6 improved by ≥ 1 optotype with the use of a lens ≥+1.00 D.
RESULTS: Overall, 866 teachers were screened (89.7% of those eligible) with complete screening data available for 858 (99.0%), among whom 762 failed screening. Distance refraction data were available for 666 of 762 (87.4%) and near refraction data for 520 of 686 (75.8%) teachers who failed screening. Of those screened, 76.2 ± 9.0% of teachers had refractive and/or accommodative error and 57.1 ± 7.6% had uncorrected refractive and/or accommodative error. Overall and uncorrected distance refractive error affected 44.2 ± 3.7% and 36.0 ± 3.6%, respectively; overall and uncorrected presbyopia affected 66.4 ± 8.1% and 41.0 ± 6.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: As defined in this program, refractive and accommodative errors were common among teachers in Jakarta.
METHODS: A total of 965 teachers from 19 schools were eligible for screening; those with uncorrected distance visual acuity (VA) ≤ 6/12-3 and teachers ≥ 35 years old with uncorrected end-point print size >Jaeger (J) 6 were referred. Autorefraction and subjective refraction were performed for teachers with confirmed decreased VA. Refractive error was considered present if sphere ≤-0.75 diopters (D), sphere ≥+0.25D or cylinder ≤-0.50 D resulted in ≥ 2 lines of improvement in VA. Presbyopia was considered present if an end-point print size >J6 improved by ≥ 1 optotype with the use of a lens ≥+1.00 D.
RESULTS: Overall, 866 teachers were screened (89.7% of those eligible) with complete screening data available for 858 (99.0%), among whom 762 failed screening. Distance refraction data were available for 666 of 762 (87.4%) and near refraction data for 520 of 686 (75.8%) teachers who failed screening. Of those screened, 76.2 ± 9.0% of teachers had refractive and/or accommodative error and 57.1 ± 7.6% had uncorrected refractive and/or accommodative error. Overall and uncorrected distance refractive error affected 44.2 ± 3.7% and 36.0 ± 3.6%, respectively; overall and uncorrected presbyopia affected 66.4 ± 8.1% and 41.0 ± 6.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: As defined in this program, refractive and accommodative errors were common among teachers in Jakarta.