Clinical & experimental optometry · 2011
Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Llorente-Guillemot Almudena, García-Lazaro Santiago, Ferrer-Blasco Teresa, Perez-Cambrodi Rafael J, Cerviño Alejandro
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim was to assess visual performance after PureVision high addition multifocal contact lens (PM) fitting through contrast sensitivity measured under different illumination levels for both distance and near.
METHODS: In a cross-over study, 20 presbyopic patients were randomly assigned to PM or spectacles. Near contrast sensitivity was measured with the Vistech VCTS 6500 system. Distance contrast sensitivity and distance visual acuity (VA) were measured with the Functional Vision Analyser under photopic (85 cd/m(2) ) and mesopic (3.0 cd/m(2) ) conditions, the latter also under two levels of induced glare: 1.0 lux and 28 lux. Near VA was measured by logMAR charts under approximately 80 cd/m(2) luminance settings.
RESULTS: Average monocular spectacle corrected and PM VA were -0.02 ± 0.05 and 0.03 ± 0.05 logMAR for distance photopic, 0.16 ± 0.10 and 0.23 ± 0.07 logMAR for distance mesopic and -0.03 ± 0.05 and 0.05 ± 0.06 logMAR for near photopic, respectively. Average binocular spectacle corrected and PM VA were -0.05 ± 0.07 and -0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR for distance photopic, 0.10 ± 0.06 and 0.18 ± 0.05 logMAR for distance mesopic and -0.08 ± 0.06 and 0.02 ± 0.05 logMAR for near photopic, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the contrast sensitivity with the two types of correction for both distance and near, with spectacle correction being better in all cases.
CONCLUSION: PureVision multifocal contact lenses preserve good VA and good visual performance under real-life conditions.
METHODS: In a cross-over study, 20 presbyopic patients were randomly assigned to PM or spectacles. Near contrast sensitivity was measured with the Vistech VCTS 6500 system. Distance contrast sensitivity and distance visual acuity (VA) were measured with the Functional Vision Analyser under photopic (85 cd/m(2) ) and mesopic (3.0 cd/m(2) ) conditions, the latter also under two levels of induced glare: 1.0 lux and 28 lux. Near VA was measured by logMAR charts under approximately 80 cd/m(2) luminance settings.
RESULTS: Average monocular spectacle corrected and PM VA were -0.02 ± 0.05 and 0.03 ± 0.05 logMAR for distance photopic, 0.16 ± 0.10 and 0.23 ± 0.07 logMAR for distance mesopic and -0.03 ± 0.05 and 0.05 ± 0.06 logMAR for near photopic, respectively. Average binocular spectacle corrected and PM VA were -0.05 ± 0.07 and -0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR for distance photopic, 0.10 ± 0.06 and 0.18 ± 0.05 logMAR for distance mesopic and -0.08 ± 0.06 and 0.02 ± 0.05 logMAR for near photopic, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the contrast sensitivity with the two types of correction for both distance and near, with spectacle correction being better in all cases.
CONCLUSION: PureVision multifocal contact lenses preserve good VA and good visual performance under real-life conditions.