Vision research · 2008
The significance of retinal image contrast and spatial frequency composition for eye growth modulation in young chicks.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tran Nina, Chiu Sara, Tian Yibin, Wildsoet Christine F
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study sought further insight into the stimulus dependence of form deprivation myopia, a common response to retinal image degradation in young animals.
METHODS: Each of 4 Bangerter diffusing filters (0.6, 0.1, <0.1, and LP (light perception only)) combined with clear plano lenses, as well as plano lenses alone, were fitted monocularly to 4-day-old chicks. Axial ocular dimensions and refractive errors were monitored over a 14-day treatment period, using high frequency A-scan ultrasonography and an autorefractor, respectively.
RESULTS: Only the <0.1 and LP filters induced significant form deprivation myopia; these filters induced similarly large myopic shifts in refractive error (mean interocular differences+/-SEM: -9.92+/-1.99, -7.26+/-1.60 D, respectively), coupled to significant increases in both vitreous chamber depths and optical axial lengths (p<0.001). The other 3 groups showed comparable, small changes in their ocular dimensions (p>0.05), and only small myopic shifts in refraction (<3.00 D). The myopia-inducing filters eliminated mid-and-high spatial frequency information.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with emmetropization being tuned to mid-spatial frequencies. They also imply that form deprivation is not a graded phenomenon.
METHODS: Each of 4 Bangerter diffusing filters (0.6, 0.1, <0.1, and LP (light perception only)) combined with clear plano lenses, as well as plano lenses alone, were fitted monocularly to 4-day-old chicks. Axial ocular dimensions and refractive errors were monitored over a 14-day treatment period, using high frequency A-scan ultrasonography and an autorefractor, respectively.
RESULTS: Only the <0.1 and LP filters induced significant form deprivation myopia; these filters induced similarly large myopic shifts in refractive error (mean interocular differences+/-SEM: -9.92+/-1.99, -7.26+/-1.60 D, respectively), coupled to significant increases in both vitreous chamber depths and optical axial lengths (p<0.001). The other 3 groups showed comparable, small changes in their ocular dimensions (p>0.05), and only small myopic shifts in refraction (<3.00 D). The myopia-inducing filters eliminated mid-and-high spatial frequency information.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with emmetropization being tuned to mid-spatial frequencies. They also imply that form deprivation is not a graded phenomenon.