DOI 10.1177/112067210301300408
The evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer in pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma using scanning laser polarimetry.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To measure the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in patients with pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS) using scanning laser polarimetry and to compare these measurements with those of normal subjects and patients with pigmentary glaucoma (PG).
METHODS
Age-, sex-, and refractive error-matched subjects--18 patients with PDS, 18 patients with PG, and 20 healthy subjects--were evaluated by scanning laser polarimetry (Nerve Fiber Analyzer [NFA] GDx). The NFA did not have a compensator for corneal polarization. One randomly selected eye from each patient was included in the statistical analysis. The NFA measurements of patients with PDS and PG and healthy subjects were compared statistically using analysis of variance, Tukey multiple comparisons, chi-square, and independent t-tests.
RESULTS
The mean values for average thickness, superior and inferior maximum, superior and inferior average, ellipse average thickness, and superior integral were found to be lower in the patients with PDS (p < 0.02) and PG (p < 0.005) compared to the normal subjects. The mean values for maximum modulation, superior ratio, inferior ratio, and superior/nasal ratio in PDS were in between those of the PG and control groups (p > 0.05). The ellipse modulation was significantly lower in the PG group when compared to the other two groups (p < 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
Retinal nerve fiber loss is present to some extent in patients with PDS and this loss is not age or sex dependent. Parameters of modulation might be more representative of significant damage of the nerve fiber layer.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.