International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2002
Short-term intravaginal maximal electrical stimulation for refractive detrusor instability.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yalcin O T, Hassa H, Sarac I
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of intravaginal maximal electrical stimulation for the treatment of refractive detrusor instability.
METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients, treated by maximal electrical stimulation for pure refractive detrusor instability were evaluated subjectively by patient's questionnaires and 24-h urinary diary and objectively by 1-h standardized pad test and subtracted cystometry before and 1 week after the treatment. Paired-t and chi(2)-tests were used for the statistical analysis of the data.
RESULTS: Thirty-one (88.6%) of the 35 patients were found to be either cured or improved, subjectively. The overall objective success rates based on the 1-h pad test and subtracted cystometry were 80.0% and 74.3%, respectively. The results of all subjective and objective assessment tests, except postvoiding residual urine volume, improved significantly after the treatment (P<0.01). No significant adverse effect related to the treatment was observed, except vaginal irritation noted only by 5 (14.3%) patients.
CONCLUSION: Maximal electrical stimulation could offer a safe, non-invasive and effective treatment for patients with detrusor instability who respond poorly to other conservative therapies.
METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients, treated by maximal electrical stimulation for pure refractive detrusor instability were evaluated subjectively by patient's questionnaires and 24-h urinary diary and objectively by 1-h standardized pad test and subtracted cystometry before and 1 week after the treatment. Paired-t and chi(2)-tests were used for the statistical analysis of the data.
RESULTS: Thirty-one (88.6%) of the 35 patients were found to be either cured or improved, subjectively. The overall objective success rates based on the 1-h pad test and subtracted cystometry were 80.0% and 74.3%, respectively. The results of all subjective and objective assessment tests, except postvoiding residual urine volume, improved significantly after the treatment (P<0.01). No significant adverse effect related to the treatment was observed, except vaginal irritation noted only by 5 (14.3%) patients.
CONCLUSION: Maximal electrical stimulation could offer a safe, non-invasive and effective treatment for patients with detrusor instability who respond poorly to other conservative therapies.