Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2000
Perception of Purkinje vessel shadows and foveal granular pattern as a measure of potential visual acuity.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murillo-Lopez F, Maumenee A E, Guyton D L
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare perception of 2 entoptic phenomena, the Purkinje vessel shadows and the foveal granular pattern, as measures of retinal visual acuity using a transscleral illumination technique that bypasses the anterior segment.
SETTING: Retinal Vascular Center and General Eye Clinic, Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
METHODS: Both eyes of 85 patients with clear ocular media, many with retinal disease, were tested for perception of these entoptic phenomena. Also, retinal visual acuity was measured with a Potential Acuity Meter through the current refractive correction.
RESULTS: Of 114 eyes with retinal acuity of 20/40 or better, 99% perceived the Purkinje vessel shadows and 86% perceived the foveal granular pattern. Of 45 eyes with retinal acuity of 20/80 or worse, 73% perceived the Purkinje vessel shadows and 4% perceived the foveal granular pattern.
CONCLUSION: Perception of the Purkinje vessel shadows does not distinguish between good and poor retinal acuity, whereas nonperception of the vessel shadows strongly suggests poor acuity. Perception of the foveal granular pattern, on the other hand, provides a positive indication of good retinal acuity and will likely prove to be predictive of good vision after removal of significant media opacity.
SETTING: Retinal Vascular Center and General Eye Clinic, Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
METHODS: Both eyes of 85 patients with clear ocular media, many with retinal disease, were tested for perception of these entoptic phenomena. Also, retinal visual acuity was measured with a Potential Acuity Meter through the current refractive correction.
RESULTS: Of 114 eyes with retinal acuity of 20/40 or better, 99% perceived the Purkinje vessel shadows and 86% perceived the foveal granular pattern. Of 45 eyes with retinal acuity of 20/80 or worse, 73% perceived the Purkinje vessel shadows and 4% perceived the foveal granular pattern.
CONCLUSION: Perception of the Purkinje vessel shadows does not distinguish between good and poor retinal acuity, whereas nonperception of the vessel shadows strongly suggests poor acuity. Perception of the foveal granular pattern, on the other hand, provides a positive indication of good retinal acuity and will likely prove to be predictive of good vision after removal of significant media opacity.