MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5797/jnet.cr.2019-0123

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2021

Two Patients with Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction after Carotid Artery Stenting.

Yoshida Yoichi, Kobayashi Eiichi, Kubota Masaaki, Adachi Akihiko, Iwadate Yasuo

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We herein report two cases of transient cerebral vasoconstriction after carotid artery stenting (CAS).

CASE PRESENTATION: An 81-year-old man presented with asymptomatic severe stenosis in the right carotid artery accompanied by a slight reduction in cerebrovascular reactivity. CAS was performed, but the patient had a generalized seizure because of transient cerebral ischemia caused by intolerance to carotid artery occlusion with balloon protection. Confusion and left hemiparesis persisted. DSA suggested cerebral ischemia due to vasoconstriction as the cause of these prolonged symptoms. A 66-year-old man presented with asymptomatic severe stenosis in the right carotid artery with slight hypoperfusion. CAS was performed. The patient developed left hemispatial neglect, dysarthria, and left hemiparesis 12 hours after the procedure. DSA revealed cerebral vasoconstriction in the responsible territory. The conditions of both patients improved within several days with medical treatment and they were discharged without neurological deficits.

CONCLUSION

The cases presented herein show that transient ischemic complications caused by cerebral vasoconstriction may develop after CAS.

Для цитирования: Yoshida Yoichi, Kobayashi Eiichi, Kubota Masaaki, Adachi Akihiko, Iwadate Yasuo. Two Patients with Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction after Carotid Artery Stenting.. Journal of neuroendovascular therapy. 2021. DOI: 10.5797/jnet.cr.2019-0123.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.