Diagnostic and interventional imaging · 2023
MRI restaging of rectal cancer: The RAC (Response-Anal canal-CRM) analysis joint consensus guidelines of the GRERCAR and GRECCAR groups.
Клинические рекомендацииСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nougaret Stephanie, Rousset Pascal, Lambregts Doenja M J, Maas Monique, Gormly Kirsten, Lucidarme Oliver, Brunelle Serge, Milot Laurent, Arrivé Lionel, Salut Celine, Pilleul Franck, Hordonneau Constance, Baudin Guillaume, Soyer Philippe, Brun Vanessa, Laurent Valérie, Savoye-Collet Celine, Petkovska Iva, Gerard Jean-Pierre, Cotte Eddy, Rouanet Philippe, Catalano Onofrio, Denost Quentin, Tan Regina Beets, Frulio Nora, Hoeffel Christine
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To develop guidelines by international experts to standardize data acquisition, image interpretation, and reporting in rectal cancer restaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evidence-based data and experts' opinions were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method to attain consensus guidelines. Experts provided recommendations for reporting template and protocol for data acquisition were collected; responses were analysed and classified as "RECOMMENDED" versus "NOT RECOMMENDED" (if ≥ 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (if < 80% consensus among experts).
RESULTS: Consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI sequences, staging and reporting was attained using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A consensus was reached for each reporting template item among the experts. Tailored MRI protocol and standardized report were proposed.
CONCLUSION: These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for rectal cancer restaging with MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evidence-based data and experts' opinions were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method to attain consensus guidelines. Experts provided recommendations for reporting template and protocol for data acquisition were collected; responses were analysed and classified as "RECOMMENDED" versus "NOT RECOMMENDED" (if ≥ 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (if < 80% consensus among experts).
RESULTS: Consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI sequences, staging and reporting was attained using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A consensus was reached for each reporting template item among the experts. Tailored MRI protocol and standardized report were proposed.
CONCLUSION: These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for rectal cancer restaging with MRI.