Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 1999
A retrospective follow-up study on intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Van Golde R, Boada M, Veiga A, Evers J, Geraedts J, Barri P
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Genetic aspects of male subfertility and the novelty of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) as a new technique can influence the development of zygotes and children born after ICSI. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of ICSI compared to in vitro fertilization (IVF).
METHODS: Data from medical records of 233 total pregnancies and the follow-up of 132 children born after IVF and 120 after ICSI were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: No differences were found between ICSI and IVF for early embryonic development and obstetric outcome. In both groups the rate of women undergoing prenatal chromosomal diagnosis was low, 30.0%. The congenital malformation rate was 3.0% after IVF and 1.7% after ICSI, which was not significantly different. Follow-up on development of children born after IVF and ICSI also showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that at this moment ICSI is a safe procedure. However, a consistent prospective follow-up is still mandatory to exclude possible risks.
METHODS: Data from medical records of 233 total pregnancies and the follow-up of 132 children born after IVF and 120 after ICSI were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: No differences were found between ICSI and IVF for early embryonic development and obstetric outcome. In both groups the rate of women undergoing prenatal chromosomal diagnosis was low, 30.0%. The congenital malformation rate was 3.0% after IVF and 1.7% after ICSI, which was not significantly different. Follow-up on development of children born after IVF and ICSI also showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that at this moment ICSI is a safe procedure. However, a consistent prospective follow-up is still mandatory to exclude possible risks.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultBirth WeightChromosome AberrationsChromosome DisordersCongenital AbnormalitiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFertilization in VitroFollow-Up StudiesGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaleMicroinjectionsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesSpermatozoa