MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00134-021-06581-1

Медицинская библиотека · Intensive care medicine · 2021

Noninvasive respiratory support following extubation in critically ill adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Fernando Shannon M, Tran Alexandre, Sadeghirad Behnam, Burns Karen E A, Fan Eddy, Brodie Daniel, Munshi Laveena, Goligher Ewan C, Cook Deborah J, Fowler Robert A, Herridge Margaret S, Cardinal Pierre, Jaber Samir, Møller Morten Hylander, Thille Arnaud W, Ferguson Niall D, Slutsky Arthur S, Brochard Laurent J, Seely Andrew J E, Rochwerg Bram

Систематический обзорСтатьяNetwork Meta-AnalysisПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Systematic review and network meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of noninvasive respiratory strategies, including noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), in reducing extubation failure among critically ill adults.

METHODS

We searched databases from inception through October 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating noninvasive respiratory support therapies (NIPPV, HFNC, conventional oxygen therapy, or a combination of these) following extubation in critically ill adults. Two reviewers performed screening, full text review, and extraction independently. The primary outcome of interest was reintubation. We used GRADE to rate the certainty of our findings.

RESULTS

We included 36 RCTs (6806 patients). Compared to conventional oxygen therapy, NIPPV (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.52-0.82]) and HFNC (OR 0.63 [95% CI 0.45-0.87]) reduced reintubation (both moderate certainty). Sensitivity analyses showed that the magnitude of the effect was highest in patients with increased baseline risk of reintubation. As compared to HFNC, no difference in incidence of reintubation was seen with NIPPV (OR 1.04 [95% CI 0.78-1.38], low certainty). Compared to conventional oxygen therapy, neither NIPPV (OR 0.8 [95% CI 0.61-1.04], moderate certainty) or HFNC (OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.66-1.24], low certainty) reduced short-term mortality. Consistent findings were demonstrated across multiple subgroups, including high- and low-risk patients. These results were replicated when evaluating noninvasive strategies for prevention (prophylaxis), but not in rescue (application only after evidence of deterioration) situations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that both NIPPV and HFNC reduced reintubation in critically ill adults, compared to conventional oxygen therapy. NIPPV did not reduce incidence of reintubation when compared to HFNC. These findings support the preventative application of noninvasive respiratory support strategies to mitigate extubation failure in critically ill adults, but not in rescue conditions.

Для цитирования: Fernando Shannon M, Tran Alexandre, Sadeghirad Behnam, Burns Karen E A, Fan Eddy, Brodie Daniel, Munshi Laveena, Goligher Ewan C, Cook Deborah J, Fowler Robert A, Herridge Margaret S, Cardinal Pierre, Jaber Samir, Møller Morten Hylander, Thille Arnaud W, Ferguson Niall D, Slutsky Arthur S, Brochard Laurent J, Seely Andrew J E, Rochwerg Bram. Noninvasive respiratory support following extubation in critically ill adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.. Intensive care medicine. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06581-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.