Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2018
Borderline QuantiFERON results and the distinction between specific responses and test variability.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Uzorka Jonathan W, Bossink Ailko W J, Franken Willeke P J, Thijsen Steven F T, Leyten Eliane M S, van Haeften Alida C, Doornenbal Gert, Boonstra Peter, Ottenhoff Tom H M, Arend Sandra M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: QuantiFERON (QFT) results near the cut-off are subject to debate. We aimed to investigate which borderline QFT results were due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb)-specific responses or to test variability.
METHODS: In a contact investigation, tuberculin skin test (TST), QFT and T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) were performed in 785 BCG-unvaccinated contacts. Contacts with a low-negative (<0.15), borderline (0.15-0.35), low-positive (0.35-0.70) or high-positive QFT (≥0.70 IU/mL) were compared with respect to exposure, TST and T-SPOT results. Development of active tuberculosis was assessed.
RESULTS: Borderline QFT results occurred in threefold excess over test variability (p = 0.0027). In contacts with low-negative, borderline or positive QFT results, a positive TST occurred in 24.9%, 62.1% and 91.4% (p < 0.0001) and a positive T-SPOT result in 6.3%, 41.3% and 86.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Two-third (20/29) of contacts with a borderline and 14/16 (88%) with a low-positive QFT had a positive TST and/or T-SPOT, indicating probable Mtb-infection. During 12 years of follow-up, seven patients were diagnosed with active tuberculosis, two of whom after a low-positive QFT.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, most borderline and low-positive QFT results were Mtb-specific, showing the biological significance of a borderline QFT. The clinical relevance, however, will be most distinct in patients who are or will be immunocompromised.
METHODS: In a contact investigation, tuberculin skin test (TST), QFT and T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) were performed in 785 BCG-unvaccinated contacts. Contacts with a low-negative (<0.15), borderline (0.15-0.35), low-positive (0.35-0.70) or high-positive QFT (≥0.70 IU/mL) were compared with respect to exposure, TST and T-SPOT results. Development of active tuberculosis was assessed.
RESULTS: Borderline QFT results occurred in threefold excess over test variability (p = 0.0027). In contacts with low-negative, borderline or positive QFT results, a positive TST occurred in 24.9%, 62.1% and 91.4% (p < 0.0001) and a positive T-SPOT result in 6.3%, 41.3% and 86.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Two-third (20/29) of contacts with a borderline and 14/16 (88%) with a low-positive QFT had a positive TST and/or T-SPOT, indicating probable Mtb-infection. During 12 years of follow-up, seven patients were diagnosed with active tuberculosis, two of whom after a low-positive QFT.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, most borderline and low-positive QFT results were Mtb-specific, showing the biological significance of a borderline QFT. The clinical relevance, however, will be most distinct in patients who are or will be immunocompromised.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentBiomarkersEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansInterferon-gammaInterferon-gamma Release TestsLatent TuberculosisMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTuberculin TestTuberculosisYoung Adult