Current eye research · 2020
Corneal Sealants in Clinical Use: A Systematic Review.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tan Jackie, Foster Leslie John Ray, Watson Stephanie Louise
Аннотация
AIM: To review the use of clinical corneal sealants for the closure of full thickness corneal wounds.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted across CENTRAL, Medline, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, mRCT and ICTRP for the keywords of 'cornea', 'full-thickness wound', 'sealant' and their synonyms. Only evidence level 2 of higher as graded by Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine were included for this review.
RESULTS: Seven studies were included; three randomized controlled trials investigated ReSure® sealant, 2 OcuSeal®, 1 human fibrin glue vs cyanoacrylate and 1 human fibrin glue as an adjunct to sutures vs sutures alone in penetrating keratoplasty. ReSure® was superior to suture for sealing leaking corneal incisions after cataract surgery despite provocation. ReSure® sealant has not been tested on complex full thickness corneal wounds, perforated ulcers or penetrating keratoplasty. OcuSeal® was also able to seal full thickness cornea wound post-cataract surgery to prevent ingress of Trypan blue dye. Human fibrin glue and cyanoacrylate were similarly effective in treating corneal perforations <3 mm of mixed etiologies.
CONCLUSION: There are limited high-level evidence for corneal sealants. The currently available sealants with human data are ReSure®, OcuSeal®, human fibrin glue and cyanoacrylates. While ReSure® and OcuSeal® are effective post-cataract surgery, there are no data for perforations from other etiologies. Post-approval data from ReSure® registry report good tolerability and no apparent safety concerns.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted across CENTRAL, Medline, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, mRCT and ICTRP for the keywords of 'cornea', 'full-thickness wound', 'sealant' and their synonyms. Only evidence level 2 of higher as graded by Oxford Centre of Evidence-based Medicine were included for this review.
RESULTS: Seven studies were included; three randomized controlled trials investigated ReSure® sealant, 2 OcuSeal®, 1 human fibrin glue vs cyanoacrylate and 1 human fibrin glue as an adjunct to sutures vs sutures alone in penetrating keratoplasty. ReSure® was superior to suture for sealing leaking corneal incisions after cataract surgery despite provocation. ReSure® sealant has not been tested on complex full thickness corneal wounds, perforated ulcers or penetrating keratoplasty. OcuSeal® was also able to seal full thickness cornea wound post-cataract surgery to prevent ingress of Trypan blue dye. Human fibrin glue and cyanoacrylate were similarly effective in treating corneal perforations <3 mm of mixed etiologies.
CONCLUSION: There are limited high-level evidence for corneal sealants. The currently available sealants with human data are ReSure®, OcuSeal®, human fibrin glue and cyanoacrylates. While ReSure® and OcuSeal® are effective post-cataract surgery, there are no data for perforations from other etiologies. Post-approval data from ReSure® registry report good tolerability and no apparent safety concerns.