MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1148/radiology.155.3.3890007

Медицинская библиотека · Radiology · 1985

Real-time sonography in suspected acute cholecystitis. Prospective evaluation of primary and secondary signs.

Ralls P W, Colletti P M, Lapin S A, Chandrasoma P, Boswell W D, Ngo C, Radin D R, Halls J M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Sonographic findings in 497 patients with suspected acute cholecystitis were analyzed prospectively. Combined use of primary and secondary sonographic signs led to excellent positive and negative predictive values. Positive predictive values for stones combined with either a positive sonographic Murphy sign (92.2%) or with gallbladder wall thickening (95.2%) were excellent for acute cholecystitis. Positive predictive value of these signs for patients requiring cholecystectomy was even higher (99.0%). Negative predictive values for combined use of primary and secondary signs to exclude acute cholecystitis were also excellent (95.0% for no stones and negative sonographic Murphy sign). Real-time sonography alone, using both primary and secondary signs, can be definitive in nearly 80% of patients with suspected acute cholecystitis. These patients require no further imaging evaluation. Sonography should be the screening test of choice in acute cholecystitis because it is cost effective, prospectively highly accurate, quick, and better at characterizing and detecting other abdominal lesions than cholescintigraphy. A proposed algorithm is described.

Для цитирования: Ralls P W, Colletti P M, Lapin S A, Chandrasoma P, Boswell W D, Ngo C, Radin D R, Halls J M. Real-time sonography in suspected acute cholecystitis. Prospective evaluation of primary and secondary signs.. Radiology. 1985. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.155.3.3890007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.