Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.) · 2018
The patient rationale for seeking HIV PEP: Qualitative results from a nurse-led program.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
O'Byrne Patrick, Orser Lauren, MacPherson Paul, Valela Nick
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: HIV PEP is an intervention to prevent HIV seroconversion among HIV-negative persons after they have come into contact with the virus. The literature suggests PEP is greater than 80% effective at reducing HIV seroconversion. To expand access to this prevention strategy, we established a nurse-led PEP program in two STI clinics.
AIMS: We sought to explore why people seek PEP, and their experiences using it.
MATERIALS & METHODS: We invited participants who used our PEP program to engage in semi-structured qualitative interviews. These were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using the techniques of thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Twelve men who initiated PEP through our program participated in an interview. Thematic analysis of the data identified three themes: (1) assessing risk, (2) euphoria and distress, and (3) reducing distress.
DISCUSSION: Based on our findings, it appears as though instances of condomless sex were atypical and unplanned, they occurred due to contextual factors (e.g., consent, desire to explore, sexual chemistry/intensity), and they resulted in a state of temporary euphoria, which, afterward, transformed into distress (i.e., "feel[ing] stupid"). The participants used PEP not only for HIV prevention, but also (and perhaps more so) to address their emotional state. PEP used seemed to primarily occur to address situations of atypical sexual contact with partners they did not "know" or "trust".
CONCLUSION: We feel these results help contextualize how potential PEP users view HIV risk assessments, and how they determine their need for this intervention.
AIMS: We sought to explore why people seek PEP, and their experiences using it.
MATERIALS & METHODS: We invited participants who used our PEP program to engage in semi-structured qualitative interviews. These were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using the techniques of thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Twelve men who initiated PEP through our program participated in an interview. Thematic analysis of the data identified three themes: (1) assessing risk, (2) euphoria and distress, and (3) reducing distress.
DISCUSSION: Based on our findings, it appears as though instances of condomless sex were atypical and unplanned, they occurred due to contextual factors (e.g., consent, desire to explore, sexual chemistry/intensity), and they resulted in a state of temporary euphoria, which, afterward, transformed into distress (i.e., "feel[ing] stupid"). The participants used PEP not only for HIV prevention, but also (and perhaps more so) to address their emotional state. PEP used seemed to primarily occur to address situations of atypical sexual contact with partners they did not "know" or "trust".
CONCLUSION: We feel these results help contextualize how potential PEP users view HIV risk assessments, and how they determine their need for this intervention.