Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
Artificial Intelligence-Based Algorithm for Stent Coverage Assessments.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fluder-Wlodarczyk Joanna, Darakhovich Mikhail, Schneider Zofia, Roleder-Dylewska Magda, Dobrolińska Magdalena, Pawłowski Tomasz, Wojakowski Wojciech, Gasior Pawel, Pociask Elżbieta
Аннотация
Background: Neointimal formation after stent implantation is an important prognostic factor since delayed healing may lead to stent thrombosis. In vivo, optical coherence tomography (OCT) can most precisely assess stent strut coverage. Since analyzing neointimal coverage is time-consuming, artificial intelligence (AI) may offer valuable assistance. This study presents the preliminary results of the AI-based tool's performance in detecting and categorizing struts as covered and uncovered. Methods: The algorithm was developed using the YOLO11 (You Only Look Once) neural networks. The first step was preprocessing, then data augmentation techniques were implemented, and the model was trained. Twenty OCT pullbacks were used during model training, and two OCT pullbacks were used in the final validation. Results: The presented tool's performance was validated against two analysts' consensus. Both analysts showed moderate intraobserver agreement (κ = 0.57 for analyst 1 and κ = 0.533 for analyst 2) and fair agreement with each other (κ = 0.389). The algorithm's detection of struts was satisfactory (a 92% positive predictive value (PPV) and a 90% true positive rate (TPR)) and was more accurate in recognizing covered struts (an 81% PPV and an 85% TPR) than uncovered struts (a 73% PPV and a 60% TPR). The agreement was κ = 0.444. Conclusions: The initial results demonstrated a good detection of struts with a more challenging uncovered strut classification. Further clinical studies with a larger sample size are needed to improve the proposed tool.