DOI 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001869
Biomechanical assessment of intraocular lens stability and position based on suture and inlet variations in the Canabrava double-flanged technique.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate how variations in suture type, suture length, and scleral outlet angle affect intraocular lens (IOL) positioning and fixation stability in the Canabrava technique, given ongoing concerns such as iris chafing and the lack of prior quantitative assessment.
SETTING
Laboratory-based experimental study using 3D-printed model eyes.
DESIGN
Experimental study using 3D-printed ocular models with controlled variation of fixation parameters.
METHODS
Using 3D-printed eye models, IOL fixation was performed with the Canabrava technique using Artis PLE IOLs. Suture types (5-0 Prolene, 6-0 Prolene, 6-0 Pronova), suture lengths (8 mm, 10 mm), and scleral outlet angles (30 degrees, 45 degrees) were systematically varied. IOL tilt and optic-haptic distance were measured using ImageJ. Fixation strength was assessed using a universal testing machine to measure the force required to produce a 2.5 mm linear displacement of IOL.
RESULTS
IOL tilt was not significantly affected by suture type but increased with longer suture length (10.0 mm vs 8.0 mm) for both 5-0 and 6-0 Prolene. Optic-haptic distance showed minimal variation, with differences noted only in the 5-0 Prolene and 6-0 Pronova groups at 8.0 mm. Scleral outlet angle also had no significant impact on optic-haptic distance. Displacement force did not differ significantly between suture types.
CONCLUSIONS
Caution is advised in patients with a predisposition to iris chafing because the risk may persist regardless of fixation parameters.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.